From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:52:13 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/08] include/configs: Better utilize CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH In-Reply-To: <20120416205631.1603E202B24@gemini.denx.de> References: <1334355606-16491-1-git-send-email-trini@ti.com> <1334355606-16491-9-git-send-email-trini@ti.com> <20120414062224.4190920022F@gemini.denx.de> <4F8C3615.9040401@ti.com> <20120416205631.1603E202B24@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4F8CB0AD.2000802@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 04/16/2012 01:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message<4F8C3615.9040401@ti.com> you wrote: >> >>> I actually tend to believe it is a bad idea to have the #ifdef for >>> CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH in >> >> And perhaps we should drop IMLS/FLASH from config_cmd_default these days? > > No. Rather I'd like to see "imls" extended to support NAND as well > :-) To be a little serious, with NAND shouldn't one be using ubifs/ubiload? -- Tom