From: Timo Ketola <timo@exertus.fi>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] i.MX25: esdhc: Add mxc_get_clock infrastructure
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:42:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8E9A79.4040304@exertus.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120418092344.E488A200229@gemini.denx.de>
On 18.04.2012 12:23, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "Timo Ketola",
>
> In message<1334735852-23415-2-git-send-email-timo@exertus.fi> you wrote:
>> Defining CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC brings in a call to get_clocks, so let's
>> implement get_clocks function. This is how it seems to be implemented
>> elsewhere. ...
> ...
>
> I understand this is a (eventually modified ?) reposting of patches you
> posted before.
Yes
> in this case it is mandatory not only to mark this in the Subject,
Ok, how to do that I learned just now.
> but also to provide a detailled change log (below the "---" line); see
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions
I tried to provide that in the 0/x message but do you mean that I should
provide it separately for every single patch? I see that your reference asks
just that.
I was in impression that 'git send-email' (alone) would do the right thing but
it doesn't give me opportunity to edit actual patch messages, only the cover
letter. And I saw many examples of people putting the log in the cover letter.
So how do people do that? 'git format-patch' then manually edit patch files,
then send them with 'git send-email'?
> I'm not going to try to find out which review comments you have included,
> and what you changed to do so; sorry, but I don;t have that much time.
So do I have to reference review comments somehow?
> Please consider the whole patch series ignored.
Ok
--
Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-12 9:33 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] i.MX25: Miscellaneus fixes Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] i.MX25: add mxc_get_clock infrastructure Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] i.MX: Add target flashable to offset 0 Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 11:11 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 11:21 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] Build: Ignore build tree and IDE control file Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 11:13 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 11:24 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 12:00 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 12:04 ` Timo Ketola
2012-08-09 20:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-13 5:43 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] i.MX25: Has a GPIO4 too Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 11:15 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 12:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-04-12 12:20 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 13:09 ` Detlev Zundel
2012-04-13 4:58 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8] MXC FEC: Resolve speed before configuring gasket Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 12:05 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 13:16 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 14:31 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 12:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-04-12 19:59 ` Troy Kisky
2012-04-12 20:12 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] i.MX25: Add Exertus EXE4026 board Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 10:43 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-12 10:57 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 12:06 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 12:09 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 12:40 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/8] MXC NAND: Place BBT patterns into free OOB region Timo Ketola
2012-04-12 9:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] i.MX25: This model has almost the same USB-controller as i.MX31 Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9 v2] i.MX25: Miscellaneus fixes Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] i.MX25: esdhc: Add mxc_get_clock infrastructure Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] i.MX25: This architecture has a GPIO4 too Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] imx: fec: Resolve speed before configuring gasket Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] imx: nand: Place BBT patterns into free OOB region Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 17:19 ` Scott Wood
2012-04-13 18:12 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 18:17 ` Scott Wood
2012-04-13 18:39 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-16 6:41 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-16 14:43 ` Scott Wood
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] i.MX25: This architecture has almost the same USB-controller as i.MX31 Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] imx: usb: There is no such register Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] imx: esdhc: Needed to use in imx-regs.h defined address Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] imx: nand: Don't invent new configuration variable Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 17:21 ` Scott Wood
2012-04-13 18:28 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-13 11:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] imx: Add u-boot.imx as target for ARM9 i.MX SOCs Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8 v3] i.MX25: Miscellaneus fixes Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] i.MX25: esdhc: Add mxc_get_clock infrastructure Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 9:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-04-18 10:42 ` Timo Ketola [this message]
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] i.MX25: This architecture has a GPIO4 too Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] imx: fec: Resolve speed before configuring gasket Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] imx: nand: Support flash based BBT Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 16:30 ` Scott Wood
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] i.MX25: This architecture has almost the same USB-controller as i.MX31 Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] imx: usb: There is no such register Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 9:05 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-18 9:15 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 10:32 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] imx: esdhc: Needed to use in imx-regs.h defined address Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 8:43 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-18 9:11 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 10:30 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-18 11:05 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 15:05 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-18 16:27 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 16:59 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 7:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] imx: Add u-boot.imx as target for ARM9 i.MX SOCs Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 8:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8 v3] i.MX25: Miscellaneus fixes Timo Ketola
2012-04-18 8:40 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 0/8] i.MX25: Preparing new board with miscellaneus fixes Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/8] i.MX25: esdhc: Add mxc_get_clock infrastructure Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:15 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 17:24 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/8] i.MX25: This architecture has a GPIO4 too Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:17 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 17:17 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 3/8] imx: fec: Resolve speed before configuring gasket Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:16 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 19:27 ` Troy Kisky
2012-04-19 20:18 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 21:13 ` Troy Kisky
2012-04-19 21:23 ` Troy Kisky
2012-04-20 4:35 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-20 7:30 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-20 8:54 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-23 7:55 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-23 8:17 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 21:28 ` Troy Kisky
2012-04-20 4:25 ` Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 4/8] imx: nand: Support flash based BBT Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 15:27 ` Scott Wood
2012-05-06 17:18 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 5/8] i.MX25: usb: Set PORTSCx register Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:16 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-01 19:46 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-06 17:19 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 6/8] imx: usb: There is no such register Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:17 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 17:20 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 7/8] i.MX2: Include asm/types.h in arch-mx25/imx-regs.h Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:17 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 17:21 ` Stefano Babic
2012-04-19 8:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 8/8] imx: Add u-boot.imx as target for ARM9 i.MX SOCs Timo Ketola
2012-04-19 16:17 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8E9A79.4040304@exertus.fi \
--to=timo@exertus.fi \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox