From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timo Ketola <timo@exertus.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:18:29 +0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX25: Prepare for LCD driver in board
	adaptation
In-Reply-To: <20120426115704.3acbc345@wker>
References: <4F8E9BD9.9090107@denx.de>
	<1334919709-5870-1-git-send-email-timo@exertus.fi>
	<20120426115704.3acbc345@wker>
Message-ID: <4F992F05.5020505@exertus.fi>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 26.04.2012 12:57, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
...
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:01:48 +0300 "Timo Ketola" <timo@exertus.fi>
> wrote:
...
>> What if I implement the driver in my board folder instead?
...
> I would prefer not including the driver in the board code. The 
> disadvantage of using the video API is increased code size. If you do
> not need the framebuffer console, then using the LCD interface is
> okay.

Then I might resubmit the original patch. Is there basically anything
else than the lack of proper attributions?

...
> If you are going to update and resubmit your mx2fb patch, then
> please base your work on the u-boot-samsung tree [1] as there are
> another lcd driver changes in this tree. Or wait until samsung tree
> will be merged and then rebase your work on top of u-boot tree.

OK

--

Timo