From: DrEagle <dreagle@doukki.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 11:02:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA8E133.3070904@doukki.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336434052.16515.85.camel@espiritosanto>
Hi,
Le 08/05/2012 01:40, Daniel Stodden a ?crit :
> On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 12:53 -0500, David Purdy wrote:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Luka Perkov <uboot@lukaperkov.net> wrote:
>>> The kwboot program boots boards based on Marvell's Kirkwood platform
>>> via Xmodem over their integrated UART.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@googlemail.com>
>>> Acked-by: Luka Perkov <uboot@lukaperkov.net>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes from version v1:
>>> * fix man page
>>> * minor cosmetic fixes in tools/kwboot.c
>>>
>>> I changed things pointed out on v1 of this patch which was originally
>>> made by Daniel.
>>>
>>
>> @ Daniel, Luka, Prafulla, etal :
>>
>> I've tried kwboot on two of my devices, and as I was expecting:
>>
>> - it worked perfectly with the v1.21 BootROM device (a Seagate GoFlex
>> Net) : Nicely done, well implemented, and the "timing" seems to be a
>> non-issue w/ kwboot. Other previous applications for UARTbooting have
>> seemed to me to be less reliable - only booting 50% or 75% of the
>> time. I tried it with kwboot a dozen times or more and it was
>> successful each time, The -p patch-for-UART-booting option is a nice
>> feature.
>>
>>
>> - it did not seem to work w/ v1.11 BootROM devices (a Pogoplug
>> V2/E02, Seagate Dockstar) {previous utilities/picocom-hacks showed the
>> same behavior - the bootROM version 1.11 apparently has some
>> difference/defect/shortcoming that does not allow this function to
>> work as the docs suggest it should. Too bad no one has pointed out
>> exactly what the issue is, or found a patch/workaround it make this
>> work on v1.11 BootROM devices.}. NOTE: It did _not_ adversely
>> affect the device otherwise. I'd seen a post on a thread at another
>> site that suggested that performing this procedure on a v1.11 device
>> could corrupt the NAND - this was __not__ the case w/ my attempts
>> (about a dozen trials, with UART uboot.kwb's and also using the -p
>> patch option w/ NAND files.
>
> Hey.
>
> Unfortunately I only have a couple Buffalo boards and a Qnap, all
> essentially the same chip.
>
> Say, if you find the time, could you run it through strace and post the
> full output? (strace -o /tmp/kwboot.log -s 256 -T ..).
>
> Just see where it bails. Maybe it's some issue worth trying to hack
> around.
Have you tried to put the bootrom in the debug mode ?
https://doukki.net/doku.php?id=wiki:tutoriels:u-boot.uart#boot_from_uart0
R?fs :
http://www.marvell.com/embedded-processors/kirkwood/assets/FS_88F6180_9x_6281_OpenSource.pdf
May be it can helps to understand the 1.11 and 1.21 differences ?
Amicalement,
---
Gk2
:-]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-02 19:16 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link Luka Perkov
2012-05-06 17:53 ` David Purdy
2012-05-06 23:33 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2012-05-07 23:40 ` Daniel Stodden
2012-05-08 9:02 ` DrEagle [this message]
2012-05-09 8:00 ` Daniel Stodden
2012-05-09 13:25 ` David Purdy
2012-05-09 17:21 ` Daniel Stodden
2012-05-09 20:32 ` DrEagle
[not found] ` <CAPOFwxqDQKZ-3xu829uUtdFpA_308tGLY5qCpsyi2BSdyn00Xg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1336444704.16515.115.camel@espiritosanto>
2012-05-08 21:23 ` David Purdy
2012-05-08 21:40 ` David Purdy
2012-05-09 7:49 ` Daniel Stodden
2012-05-07 8:19 ` Holger Brunck
2012-05-16 12:22 ` Simon Guinot
2012-05-21 21:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] " Daniel Stodden
2012-05-21 21:33 ` Daniel Stodden
2012-05-21 21:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-05-24 6:53 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2012-05-21 21:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA8E133.3070904@doukki.net \
--to=dreagle@doukki.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox