From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:01:48 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX: fsl_esdhc: allow use with cache
	enabled.
In-Reply-To: <20120515150933.7f642e77@wker>
References: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/#119312>	<1335400128-1469-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>	<CAKWjMd7n84w5Rur7UGokSD7cVOaBLA1y7B5OjQKLoN3B2Pe9Xg@mail.gmail.com>	<4FA9ACE2.9010408@boundarydevices.com>	<4FAA0471.7090905@denx.de>	<4FB2530E.50303@de.bosch.com>
	<20120515150933.7f642e77@wker>
Message-ID: <4FB2E05C.6070304@boundarydevices.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 05/15/2012 06:09 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:58:54 +0200
> Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 09.05.2012 07:45, Stefano Babic wrote:
> ...
>>> The problem with an #ifdef is that it is not very generic - we should
>>> add some #if (defined(CONFIG_MX51) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || ...
>>> and update the driver for each new SOCs. I think also that maybe the
>>> best way is to add an empty flush_dcache_range() to the MPC85xx, maybe
>>> as weak function.
>>
>> You might have noticed that I'm looking through my list of open patches.
>> So: Any news regarding V3 of this patch? ;)
>
> Stefano is on vacation; please don't expect any quick reply from him.
>

Vacation? Is that one of those European words I should really know? ;)

I don't have the same excuse. I'm just struggling to find a few hours
to take a stab at this.

I'm without a PPC device and compiler, so I'll need some assistance in
validating things.

Regards,


Eric