From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:07:37 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] tegra: enable SPL build for seaboard In-Reply-To: <20120518222440.GC30009@nvidia.com> References: <1336633347-8049-1-git-send-email-amartin@nvidia.com> <1336633347-8049-7-git-send-email-amartin@nvidia.com> <4FB1E460.7010405@wwwdotorg.org> <20120518222440.GC30009@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <4FBBC7D9.5030607@wwwdotorg.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 05/18/2012 04:24 PM, Allen Martin wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:06:40PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/10/2012 01:02 AM, Allen Martin wrote: ... >> Perhaps we can just create a new tegra_spl board for the SPL rather than >> having an SPL variant for each board. Still, I don't know how we'd >> represent the UART differences if we did that though. > > I tossed out that idea as part of the discussion about using a > separate toolchain for the SPL, but Wolfgang shot it down: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/122248.html Is that the right link? That message seems to be talking about a CROSS_COMPILE_SPL variable rather than having a separate boards.cfg entry for a Tegra SPL.