[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet: add tool to support pbl image build.

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On 06/05/2012 09:45 PM, Xie Shaohui-B21989 wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:14 AM
>> To: Xie Shaohui-B21989
>> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Tabi Timur-B04825
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/CoreNet: add tool to support pbl
>> image build.
>>
>> On 06/05/2012 12:35 AM, Xie Shaohui-B21989 wrote:
>>>>> +++ b/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>>>>> +#
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#PBL preamble and RCW header
>>>>> +aa55aa55 010e0100
>>>>> +#64 bytes RCW data for P4080, replace it when building image #for
>>>>> +P3041DS or P5020DS.
>>>>> +4c580000 00000000 18185218 0000cccc 40464000 3c3c2000 58000000
>>>>> +61000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 008b6000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> +00000000 00000000
>>>>
>>>> Could you have the tool source this from a separate file, rather than
>>>> require the user to replace it manually?
>>>
>>> [Xie Shaohui] Then I have to prepare a separate file and a tool...
>>> It is quite simple to replace, just copy and paste, and users may need
>>> to modify the RCW when the default one does not fit their use case,
>>> they will always have to do it manually. It's simple to do it here.
>>
>> I disagree that copy and paste is good enough, though taking an external
>> RCW source (such as output from Timur's tool) could be a future
>> enhancement.
>
> [Xie Shaohui] OK. Suppose we got the output from Timur's tool, what
> should we do for the input if we need to change the RCW?

You change the input to Timur's tool -- that's what it's for.  It
compiles a textual description of the RCW settings into a PBL image.

> Can Timur's
> tool do it automatically, or by some arguments provided? And even
> though, there will be two files for configuration, one is RCW output
> from Timur's tool, and another is PBI commands. This is too much for
> the tool; it has only one entry for configuration file.

Too much for which tool, and why can't that be changed?

>>>> Talk to Timur (when he gets back from vacation in a couple weeks)
>>>> about his RCW tool and how best to accept the output it produces.
>>>>
>>>> Why is eSPI in here?  Isn't this supposed to just generically write
>>>> an image into CPC SRAM?
>>>
>>> [Xie Shaohui] No. some interfaces need to be pre-initialized before
>>> PBL start to load stuff from it, and default configurations for SPI is
>>> suitable, this tool provides a more compatible configurations.
>>
>> What do you mean by a more compatible configuration?  If the default is
>> good enough to load the first few PBL commands, why is it not goot enough
>> to load the rest?
>
> [Xie Shaohui] the default configurations for SPI is too slow, it will
> take more than half minutes to finish the loading.

Please add a comment describing what you're doing to the SPI controller
and why.  Are there any situations where the faster speed you're
programming won't work?

-Scott