From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:04:24 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an
 unidentified CPU type
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKpS9QaFtkTGwKNKnePVtS=+4RqW=evMW1Hij2SQUeGnrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1339937889-15538-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
	<4FDDFB28.2090303@denx.de>
	<CAP9ODKoYLWcO-5W9xUcEnvtkbgJNXqOTkE7dAXHiPvXVVyuLxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201206171803.28260.marex@denx.de>
	<CAP9ODKpS9QaFtkTGwKNKnePVtS=+4RqW=evMW1Hij2SQUeGnrg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FDE1C28.8030605@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 17/06/2012 19:50, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>> But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because
>>> Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches.
>>
>> And I like it more, it looks less like a typo.
> 
> Sorry; I didn't get what you meant ... should it go or not?

Hi Otavio,

I make also my point clearer for Marek: my point is that the behavior
for all i.MX must be consistent. If you change here, please change also
for i.MX31 (that returns "unknown in print_cpuinfo) and for other SOCs
that returns "unknown" in print_cpuinfo() - or let the code as now.

Best regards,
Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================