public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: enable unaligned access on ARMv7
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:56:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEA21F5.4080803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120622111501.21e1fdcc@aari01-12>

On 06/22/2012 04:15 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:06:20 +0200, Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de> wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
>>> On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>>>> Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for
>>>> unaligned access on ARM v7, rather than doing the software
>>>> fallback. According to ARM this is safe as all v7 implementations
>>>> have to support this feature.
>>>> (http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0471c/BABJFFAE.html)
>>>>
>>>> To avoid CPU hangs when doing unaligned memory access, we have to
>>>> turn off alignment checking in our CPU initialisation code.
>>>> (http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0491c/CIHCGCFD.html)
>>>
>>> Does this behavior change trickle down to Linux/... too, or would
>>> an OS completely re-initialize this state, and hence not be
>>> affected?
>>>
>>
>> Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
>> reasonable OS to do so.
> 
> Then what is the point of enabling it on U-Boot? Does it fix some issue
> whereby some mis-aligned piece of data cannot be properly aligned?
> 

This is a new optimization feature in gcc 4.7 (and backported to some
4.6 versions like the ubuntu 12.04 arm cross compiler (4.6.3)):

http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2012-June/012360.html

http://seabright.co.nz/2012/06/11/kernel-not-booting-with-linaro-gcc/

If you don't want to enable unaligned accesses, then
"-mno-unaligned-access" needs to be added.

Regards,
Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-26 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-05 17:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: enable unaligned access on ARMv7 Lucas Stach
2012-06-05 18:42 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-05 19:06   ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22  9:15     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-22  9:36       ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 11:16         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-22 11:47           ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 22:11             ` Aneesh V
2012-06-22 22:13               ` Aneesh V
2012-06-23  9:01                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-23 17:43                   ` V, Aneesh
2012-06-25 20:34                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-25 21:49                       ` Aneesh V
2012-06-25 22:02                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-06-23 19:50                   ` Måns Rullgård
2012-06-24  6:30                   ` Lucas Stach
     [not found]                     ` <20120625221741.3a32790e@lilith>
2012-06-25 21:34                       ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-26 20:56       ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-06-27 10:14         ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-02  9:42           ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: armv7: add compile option -mno-unaligned-access if available Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-02  9:53             ` Måns Rullgård
2012-07-02 15:16               ` Lucas Stach
2012-07-02 16:14                 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-07-03  7:10                   ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-05  7:57                   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-18 21:37                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19  4:31                     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19  4:29                   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19  6:28                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19 14:27                       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-20  7:12                         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-12 15:12             ` Gary Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FEA21F5.4080803@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox