From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] arm: bugfix: save_boot_params_default accesses uninitalized stack when -O0
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:00:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF6EF6B.6060809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF68155.6090103@kmckk.co.jp>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2012 11:10 PM, Tetsuyuki Kobayashi wrote:
> save_boot_params_default() in cpu.c accesses uninitialized stack
> area when it compiled with -O0 (not optimized).
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi <koba@kmckk.co.jp> --- Hi Tom,
> Albert,
>
> I rewrite them in asm language and put it to start.S. No warning
> now. I tested it quickly on my kzm9g board.
>
> Changes for v2: - include <linux/compiler.h> and use __naked
> instead of __attribute__((naked))
>
> Changes for v3: - move __naked after void - reformat comments
>
> Changes for v4: - v3 causes following warnings cpu.c: In function
> 'save_boot_params_default': cpu.c:48:1: warning: -fstack-usage not
> supported for this target [enabled by default] - move
> save_boot_params_default() and save_boot_params() from cpu.c to
> start.S and write them in asm language
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c | 7 -------
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed,
> 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c
> index c6fa8ef..b0677f4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c +++
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c @@ -37,13 +37,6 @@ #include
> <asm/cache.h> #include <asm/armv7.h>
>
> -void save_boot_params_default(u32 r0, u32 r1, u32 r2, u32 r3) -{
> -} - -void save_boot_params(u32 r0, u32 r1, u32 r2, u32 r3) -
> __attribute__((weak, alias("save_boot_params_default"))); - int
> cleanup_before_linux(void) { /* diff --git
> a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S index
> 261835b..4feade5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S +++
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S @@ -350,6 +350,21 @@
> ENTRY(cpu_init_crit) ENDPROC(cpu_init_crit) #endif
>
> +/*************************************************************************
>
>
>
+ *
> + * void save_boot_params_default(u32 r0, u32 r1, u32 r2, u32 r3)
> + * + * Stack pointer is not yet initialized + * Don't save
> anything to stack even if compiled with -O0 + * +
> *************************************************************************/
>
>
>
+ENTRY(save_boot_params_default)
> + bx lr @ back to my caller +ENDPROC(save_boot_params_default) +
> + .weak save_boot_params + .set save_boot_params,
> save_boot_params_default + #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD /*
> *************************************************************************
We
>
>
shouldn't, I believe, need to call this save_boot_params_default
and then alias it. We should be able to just call it save_boot_params
and declare it weak, then omap3 for example will override a link time
(this should be easily verifiable with objdump). Thanks!
- --
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP9u9rAAoJENk4IS6UOR1W0oAQAJnM2ENHS3yhv3i+bUTJpXjI
sFPiQAd9t/QzDpCr7/xm05+mTciRUmzJ9tIF/XUQbVZPJZvxnfit43EVxaNuyQyZ
RC6Le9RBHzSFXmx2EwCUrNzog7Q3oOjAS6GVa2UaGsLf2lTcJrhomYNtk30cSwUw
sSQobL/jr5668Obuf1WQxEbextTt6JLTeWqCfsEBesg1eENqkskWQHg6zA8HD85i
RLYux9VEhZ/PaunH5K1RNOG3SzXZzhbxTwl4EpQ+6V8ocGqRG2tghWW/o5oG2Mjv
/i65FD0RbQhzqjX4z2far4PYBvVs+LIwPIUKZmP7A3QDrzoapCC7bk2nRBsfLPMX
xN3NeU13KsBre+7IFvMYvCCrZYSSMYRqAjNFxZwEJMeH7p3zGcDPGdAKaqCEDCJU
chNzcfhFiYezGGT4x7Sk5Apw7dj7kReC4mcuXAr9KHDV0tZy78nqqOa8wgxKgsz1
S4fiiDRwIHY+U/KgLW8ayv8VzSnDLTN6GJ23MWQiv1BXHdq77F2vDpytepR9m6BU
JT3Dtesdh5GmA0PSaRq9Wfh0TzTPkYJd91XD8JXulCpRJmxa70O5dVrE6mXWDyAQ
98esMJxyyOEFCcsRb7U2/NsRHLbuLjAKdF3nyzGaBp1qhvY/d5zsYwgNfIx3dpWk
SZohRX5nOA0Y+ZcphGih
=51Xu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 12:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: bugfix: save_boot_params_default accesses uninitalized stack when -O0 Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-27 17:40 ` Tom Rini
2012-06-28 1:14 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-28 11:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-28 14:57 ` Tom Rini
2012-06-28 16:00 ` koba
2012-06-29 9:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-29 14:21 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-05 9:25 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-05 11:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-05 16:18 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-05 17:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-06 6:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-06 14:00 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2012-07-07 7:14 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-09 8:55 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF6EF6B.6060809@ti.com \
--to=trini@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox