[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6qsabresd: Add basic support

[Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>]

Hi Fabio,

On 15.04.2012 11:02, stefano babic wrote:
> Am 14/04/2012 22:13, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>> Dear Stefano,
>>
>> In message <4F898CA5.8070308@denx.de> you wrote:
>>> The start address CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START is the lowest address of the
>>> SDRAM that can be accessed, that is MMDC0_ARB_BASE_ADDR (0x10000000) for
>>> i.MX6.
>> But it _should_ be the lowest address that can _safely_ be used for
>> such tests, i. e. the range MEMTEST_START - MEMTEST_START must neither
>> contain the exception vectors, not U-Boot's code, stack or malloc arena.
>>
>>> dynamically, also the last RAM address that can be tested should be
>>> computed at run time and not at compile time with CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END.
>> CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END is NOT the end of physical RAM, but the end of
>> the range that can be tested without crashing U-Boot...
> 
> Well, but why do we have to define at compile time this value, that in
> most cases can be wrong ? Why should "mtest" use a default value if not
> all parameters are passed ? IMHO it is better if mtest returns with an
> error if end address is not provided.
> 
>> Such a patch would be wrong.
> 
> Really I think it is better to get rid completely of
> CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START and CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END without trying to
> make some (maybe wrong) assumptions, and let mtest doing its job

Will we get an update of this patch?

Many thanks and best regards

Dirk