From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBCaWXDn21hbm4=?= <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:32:36 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm: cm4008,
 cm41xx: set gd->ram_size in dram_init
In-Reply-To: <4FFC1DDF.2060903@opengear.com>
References: <201207061015.12028.yann.vernier@orsoc.se>
	<4FF6A53C.8080309@gmail.com>
	<201207061114.59249.yann.vernier@orsoc.se>
	<4FF6BCFC.4030500@gmail.com> <20120709235851.091000f4@lilith>
	<4FFC1DDF.2060903@opengear.com>
Message-ID: <4FFE99B4.4090800@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 10.07.2012 14:19, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 07:58 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:25:00 +0200, "Andreas Bie?mann"
>> <andreas.devel@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear Yann Vernier,
>>>
>>> On 06.07.2012 11:14, Yann Vernier wrote:
>>>> On Friday 06 July 2012 10:43:40 you wrote:

<snip>

>>>>
>>>> Could I save the value decoding and corresponding configuration
>>>> changes for a
>>>> fourth patch?
>>>
>>> I'm fine with this suggestion.
>>> So the next question is who would pull it in mainline? Since this is arm
>>> related I guess Albert is the one in question.
>>
>> Ah, board-related patches. :)
>>
>>> I think these three patches are all fixes to get a board already in
>>> mainline working.
> 
> Fixes or improvements?

I think these are fixes cause the board seems to not working without
these changes.

>> So I think we should try to get these in -rc1.
>>> Albert, can you please comment?
>>
>> If the cm4008/cm41xx board maintainer (as per MAINTAINERS, this is
>> Greg Ungerer,
>> Cc:) green-lights it, then I'm ok for pulling it in.
> 
> I have no problem with them. I have only done a visual inspection of the
> revised patches in the mail archives, and not tested them on the real
> hardware.
> 
> I would suggest defining the proper meanings of the remaining bits in
> the SDRAM setup registers that are still magic numbers, but that can be
> a future change.

Definitely.

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann