From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] i.MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:41:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50055D8A.9070903@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKohncqUDKgoq17zrtNTNc49f=96gGr+Xkn2fNRwpXWkrg@mail.gmail.com>
On 17/07/2012 14:16, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
>> Simply a general remark - I think we can discuss further when first
>> patches for MX23 will be submitted. However, I think is a bad idea to
>> specialize functions to a specific SOC. If a driver needs such as
>> function, we will introduce some nasty #ifdef in driver code only to
>> select which function must be called. And we duplicate this problem in
>> all drivers.
>>
>> Instead of that, we could use the same general name. Where do we put
>> mx23 code ? If we put it together with mx28 code (I mean in the same
>> directory) we could extract specific SOC function from general files and
>> use the mechanism provided by Makefile to compile the right one, for
>> example:
>>
>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_MX28) += spl_mem_mx28.o
>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_MX23) += spl_mem_mx23.o
>>
>> and spl_mem_init.c contains general code. Drivers call always the same
>> function. Of course, this is only an example. At the moment, most mx28
>> function have the mx28_ prefix, but this is acceptable because up now
>> the mx28 is the only one in this architecture.
>
> Agreed; I will check my current work in progress code and rework it
> this way. However this prefix change is highly desired as it is
> callmed m28 (looking as m28evk specific) instead of mx28.
Yes, mx28 is a better name - if a prefix, it should be a SOC prefix, not
a board name.
But I noted :
-uint32_t dram_vals[] = {
+uint32_t mx28_dram_vals[] = {
0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000,
0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000,
0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000,
why is this structure not static ?
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-17 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 20:39 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] i.MX28 SoC pending patches Otavio Salvador
2012-07-16 20:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS when initializing power Otavio Salvador
2012-07-16 20:42 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-16 21:45 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-07-16 20:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] i.MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization Otavio Salvador
2012-07-16 20:43 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-17 9:15 ` Stefano Babic
2012-07-17 12:16 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-07-17 12:41 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-07-17 12:52 ` Otavio Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50055D8A.9070903@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox