From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: work around assembler bug
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:08:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500822EF.1020203@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120719080619.72f89f3b@lilith>
On 07/18/2012 11:06 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Allen,
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:45:53 -0700, Allen Martin <amartin@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Disable sibling call optimization based on binutils version. This is
>> to work around a bug in the assember in binutils versions < 2.22.
>> Branches to weak symbols can be incorrectly optimized in thumb mode to
>> a short branch (b.n instruction) that won't reach when the symbol gets
>> preempted.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12532
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Allen Martin <amartin@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> changes for v4:
>> -removed warning print
>> changes for v3:
>> -split shell line to improve readability
>> changes for v2:
>> -changed GAS_BUG_12532 from yes/no to y/n to be consistent
>> -added additional warning about code size increase
>> ---
>> arch/arm/config.mk | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/config.mk b/arch/arm/config.mk
>> index 3f4453a..24b9d7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/config.mk
>> +++ b/arch/arm/config.mk
>> @@ -87,3 +87,21 @@ endif
>> ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
>> LDFLAGS_u-boot += -pie
>> endif
>> +
>> +#
>> +# FIXME: binutils versions < 2.22 have a bug in the assembler where
>> +# branches to weak symbols can be incorrectly optimized in thumb mode
>> +# to a short branch (b.n instruction) that won't reach when the symbol
>> +# gets preempted
>> +#
>> +# http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12532
>> +#
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD),y)
>> +ifeq ($(GAS_BUG_12532),)
>> +export GAS_BUG_12532:=$(shell if [ $(call binutils-version) -lt 0222 ] ; \
>> + then echo y; else echo n; fi)
>> +endif
>> +ifeq ($(GAS_BUG_12532),y)
>> +PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
>> +endif
>> +endif
>
> Can previous reviewers ack or test this? I would like to have it in the ARM
> master branch in time for 12.07.
Acked-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
--
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-18 23:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] tools, config.mk: add binutils-version Allen Martin
2012-07-18 23:45 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: work around assembler bug Allen Martin
2012-07-19 6:06 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19 15:08 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2012-08-01 17:34 ` Allen Martin
2012-10-04 8:47 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19 3:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] tools, config.mk: add binutils-version Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19 15:08 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-19 15:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19 15:38 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-19 16:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19 16:54 ` Tom Rini
2012-08-01 22:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-01 22:46 ` Allen Martin
2012-08-01 22:55 ` Graeme Russ
2012-08-01 23:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-08-02 17:12 ` Allen Martin
2012-08-02 19:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500822EF.1020203@ti.com \
--to=trini@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox