From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:40:44 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12 In-Reply-To: <5009CEE5.3000902@gmail.com> References: <20120720113612.799daadde75c2e9020cf01e5@freescale.com> <201207202309.41619.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <5009CEE5.3000902@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5009D05C.1000004@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 07/20/2012 04:34 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Kim & Marek, > > On 07/21/2012 07:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Dear Kim Phillips, >> >>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:30:49 +0200 >>> >>> Detlev Zundel wrote: >>>> as promised, here are my expanded notes from the BoF meeting at LSM2012 >>>> last week. It was a pleasure to get some core developers into one room >>> >>> Any word on Kconfig support? >>> >>> Kim >> >> I was digging in it for a bit, but then Graeme took over. > > I have started on it - I've ported over the Kbuild infrastructure into a > dedicated 'kbuild' makefile which is called from the main makefile. This > make modifications to the existing makefile very minimal > > Now it's just a case of building all the Kconfig files which is, to say the > least, a massive task. I have a lot of other things going on, so > unfortunately progress is slow How about a transitional phase, where a symbol can either be a kconfig symbol or handled the old way via the board config file? That way, custodians/maintainers could handle the conversion of their own symbols (with the expectation that this be done within a reasonable timeframe). -Scott