From: Horst Kronstorfer <u-boot@aon.at>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dts/Makefile: Turn off system-/gcc-specific predefined macros
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:06:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5010EC5E.40109@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207251206.46958.vapier@gentoo.org>
On 07/25/2012 06:06 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 July 2012 15:38:55 Horst Kronstorfer wrote:
>> On 07/24/2012 05:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 24 July 2012 06:11:04 Horst Kronstorfer wrote:
>>>> On 07/19/2012 05:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>> On Friday 13 July 2012 09:03:40 Horst Kronstorfer wrote:
>>>>>> Add '-undef' to DTS_CPPFLAGS to avoid unwanted expansion of dts
>>>>>> content that matches system-specific or gcc-specific predefined
>>>>>> macros.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Example: A number of PowerPC related *.dts files in the kernel define
>>>>>> a property named 'linux,network-index' which (w/o '-undef') is
>>>>>> expanded to '1,network-index' by the preprocessor because of '#define
>>>>>> linux 1.'
>>>>>
>>>>> i think you should use -ansi instead. that's what we use in other
>>>>> places for the same reason.
>>>>
>>>> this would increase the probability of a name clash.
>>>
>>> no idea what you're talking about. have you actually looked at the
>>> output of `gcc -E -dD -ansi` ?
>>
>> $ gcc -E -dM -ansi - </dev/null | wc -l
>> 229
>> $ gcc -E -dM -undef - </dev/null | wc -l
>> 2
>
> and ? did you *look* at the output ? they're all of the form __foo__.
i already considered that.
> do any device trees really use __foo__ names ? i don't think so.
is there any drawback using '-undef' in this particular case besides
"we use -ansi in other places for the same reason"?
-h
> -mike
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-13 13:03 [U-Boot] [PATCH] dts/Makefile: Turn off system-/gcc-specific predefined macros Horst Kronstorfer
2012-07-19 3:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-24 10:11 ` Horst Kronstorfer
2012-07-24 15:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-24 19:38 ` Horst Kronstorfer
2012-07-25 16:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-26 7:06 ` Horst Kronstorfer [this message]
2012-07-26 16:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-26 21:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH,v2] dts/Makefile: Turn off some " Horst Kronstorfer
2012-08-10 21:53 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH, v2] " Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-10 21:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] dts/Makefile: Turn off system-/gcc-specific " Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5010EC5E.40109@aon.at \
--to=u-boot@aon.at \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox