* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci: add the udelay for completed post-request
@ 2012-07-27 2:33 Jaehoon Chung
2012-08-30 21:55 ` Andy Fleming
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaehoon Chung @ 2012-07-27 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
To ensure that complete the request, add udelay(100).
Also increased the timeout value to 10000.
(Because timeout value is short, there is the case that didn't transfer data)
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
---
drivers/mmc/sdhci.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
index ac39e48..f71a14b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int sdhci_transfer_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
{
unsigned int stat, rdy, mask, timeout, block = 0;
- timeout = 10000;
+ timeout = 100000;
rdy = SDHCI_INT_SPACE_AVAIL | SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL;
mask = SDHCI_DATA_AVAILABLE | SDHCI_SPACE_AVAILABLE;
do {
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ int sdhci_send_command(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd,
if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR) &&
!is_aligned && (data->flags == MMC_DATA_READ))
memcpy(data->dest, aligned_buffer, trans_bytes);
+ udelay(100);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci: add the udelay for completed post-request
2012-07-27 2:33 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci: add the udelay for completed post-request Jaehoon Chung
@ 2012-08-30 21:55 ` Andy Fleming
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Fleming @ 2012-08-30 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> To ensure that complete the request, add udelay(100).
> Also increased the timeout value to 10000.
> (Because timeout value is short, there is the case that didn't transfer data)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/sdhci.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
> index ac39e48..f71a14b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int sdhci_transfer_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
> {
> unsigned int stat, rdy, mask, timeout, block = 0;
>
> - timeout = 10000;
> + timeout = 100000;
> rdy = SDHCI_INT_SPACE_AVAIL | SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL;
> mask = SDHCI_DATA_AVAILABLE | SDHCI_SPACE_AVAILABLE;
> do {
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ int sdhci_send_command(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd,
> if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR) &&
> !is_aligned && (data->flags == MMC_DATA_READ))
> memcpy(data->dest, aligned_buffer, trans_bytes);
> + udelay(100);
These sorts of changes (both the increased timeout, and the udelay)
look very much like attempting to use time to substitute for proper
coherency assurances. What "request" is this udelay allowing to
finish?
Andy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-30 21:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-27 2:33 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci: add the udelay for completed post-request Jaehoon Chung
2012-08-30 21:55 ` Andy Fleming
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox