From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 19:18:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/8] lib: rsa: take spl/non-spl into account when
 building rsa_verify_with_pkey()
In-Reply-To: <20200522141937.3523692-2-heiko@sntech.de>
References: <20200522141937.3523692-1-heiko@sntech.de>
 <20200522141937.3523692-2-heiko@sntech.de>
Message-ID: <5018990.Qxp6z9GvRN@diego>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am Freitag, 22. Mai 2020, 16:19:31 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> Right now in multiple places there are only checks for the full
> CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY option, not split into main,spl,tpl variants.
> 
> This breaks when the rsa functions get enabled for SPL, for example to
> verify u-boot proper from spl.
> 
> So fix this by using the existing helpers to distinguis between
> build-steps.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

transplanting a tag from v4:
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>