[U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd/cfi_flash: fix write problems for Numonyx P33/30 32 MBit flashs

[Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>]

Hi Stefan,

On 08/09/2012 08:09 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 04:52 PM, Holger Brunck wrote:
>> commit 54652991
>> Work around bug in Numonyx P33/P30 256-Mbit 65nm flash chips
>>
>> fixes a problem for Numonyx P33/P30 flashes for 256-Mbit, but this leads
>> to problems for smaller versions of this chip e.g. the 32Mbit version
>> with deviceid 0x16 on mgcoge. So move the code for this work around to
>> an own function and check previously manufacturer id and device id to
>> not break support for other flashes where this work around is not needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>> cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>> cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
>> cc: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
>> index 35294bc..690748d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c
>> @@ -1391,6 +1391,43 @@ int write_buff (flash_info_t * info, uchar * src, ulong addr, ulong cnt)
>>   */
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_PROTECTION
>>  
>> +#define INTEL_COMPAT		0x89
>> +#define DEV_ID_NUMONYX_256MBIT	0x8922
> 
> Adding defines in the middle of the source is frowned upon.
> 
> Why don't you use INTEL_MANUFACT from flash.h instead. And add the
> device id in this header as well? I would prefer this.
> 

agreed, I'll prepare a v2. Thanks.

Regards
Holger