public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] mx5: Optimize lowlevel_init for TO 3
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:20:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5031F354.5030307@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179733873.2404125.1344957583298.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>

On 14/08/2012 17:19, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> The mx5 lowlevel_init.S contains code that detects the silicon revision at
> runtime, and that behaves differently if a silicon revision older than TO 3 is
> detected. This code is useless for recently designed boards that may not be
> fitted with older silicon revisions. Hence, this patch adds an option to
> optimize away this revision-specific code from lowlevel_init.S.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> ---

Hi Beno?t,

> Changes for v2:
>  - Make patch description more detailed.
> 
>  .../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S         |    4 ++--
>  .../doc/README.imx5                                |    7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

The ROM revision is currently detected at run time - because this does
not fix an evident bug, your patch intends to reduce the footprint.

Then I chacked on a mx51evk, a board thet was shipped by Freescale with
TO 2 (and maybe TO 1 ?), and there are surely samples with TO2 or TO3 in
the world.

Without the poatch:

Configuring for mx51evk - Board: mx51evk, Options:
IMX_CONFIG=board/freescale/mx51evk/imximage.cfg
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 258168	  15872	 268464	 542504	  84728	./u-boot

With the patch:

Configuring for mx51evk - Board: mx51evk, Options:
IMX_CONFIG=board/freescale/mx51evk/imximage.cfg
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 258140	  15872	 268492	 542504	  84728	./u-boot

We win only 28 bytes - on the other side, we had a CONFIG_ that is not
so clear how to be used, mainly if a board as the mx51evk was shipped
with both versions.

I think the advantages are negligible here.

Best regards,
Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-20  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-14 14:43 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mx5: cosmetic: Clean up lowlevel_init Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx5: Optimize lowlevel_init code size Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:52   ` Otavio Salvador
2012-08-14 15:19     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-30 12:47       ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-30 12:49       ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-14 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx5: Optimize lowlevel_init for TO 3 Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:56   ` Otavio Salvador
2012-08-14 15:19     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-20  8:20       ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-08-20 10:12         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mx5: Mark lowlevel_init board-specific code Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-15 14:34   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-05 20:07   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-07 14:29     ` Stefano Babic
2012-11-16 22:42       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-19  7:42         ` Stefano Babic
2012-11-19  7:57     ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-14 14:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mx5: cosmetic: Clean up lowlevel_init Otavio Salvador
2012-08-14 15:18   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-17 11:41     ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-20  7:56     ` Stefano Babic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5031F354.5030307@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox