From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] at91: atmel_nand: extract HWECC initialization code into one function: atmel_hw_nand_init_param().
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:21:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5032E281.6000906@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502CB5CC.10601@gmail.com>
On 08/16/2012 03:56 AM, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Dear Josh Wu,
>
> On 16.08.2012 07:05, Josh Wu wrote:
>> Extract the hwecc initialization code into one function. It is a preparation for adding atmel PMECC support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
>> index de66382..113da93 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
>> @@ -232,68 +232,19 @@ static int atmel_nand_correct(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat,
>> static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode)
>> {
>> }
>> -#endif
>> -
>> -static void at91_nand_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> - int cmd, unsigned int ctrl)
>> -{
>> - struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
>> -
>> - if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) {
>> - ulong IO_ADDR_W = (ulong) this->IO_ADDR_W;
>> - IO_ADDR_W &= ~(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MASK_ALE
>> - | CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MASK_CLE);
>> -
>> - if (ctrl & NAND_CLE)
>> - IO_ADDR_W |= CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MASK_CLE;
>> - if (ctrl & NAND_ALE)
>> - IO_ADDR_W |= CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MASK_ALE;
>> -
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ENABLE_PIN
>> - at91_set_gpio_value(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ENABLE_PIN,
>> - !(ctrl & NAND_NCE));
>> -#endif
>> - this->IO_ADDR_W = (void *) IO_ADDR_W;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE)
>> - writeb(cmd, this->IO_ADDR_W);
>> -}
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READY_PIN
>> -static int at91_nand_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> +int atmel_hw_nand_init_param(struct nand_chip *nand)
>
> Grr ... just realized your kernel patch has the same named function. I
> would have named it with 'ecc' in ... nevertheless I would accept this.
>
>> {
>> - return at91_get_gpio_value(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READY_PIN);
>> -}
>> -#endif
>> -
>> -int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
>> -{
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ATMEL_NAND_HWECC
>> static int chip_nr = 0;
>
> This seems to be an remnant. It seems this is a mixture between
> 'SELF_INIT' and older initialization by common nand code. Can you please
> adopt to the CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SELFINIT? -> please read doc/REDME.nand
> If I got this correctly you just need to move this static chip_nr plus
> mtd detection (nand_scan_ident()) into the board_nand_init() and call it
> _always_. Next step is to define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SELFINIT in
> include/nand.h and fix compiler issues (board_nand_init then has no
> parameter).
nand_scan_tail() needs to be called at some point too (or just call
nand_scan() if you don't have anything to do in between).
> I dunno if this is ok to call the nand_scan_ident twice when hwecc is
> enabled. Scott, can you please comment?
It's not how the function is meant to be used.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-16 5:05 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/5] at91: 9x5: Enable PMECC(Programmable Multibit ECC controller) support Josh Wu
2012-08-16 5:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] at91: atmel_nand: extract HWECC initialization code into one function: atmel_hw_nand_init_param() Josh Wu
2012-08-16 8:56 ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-08-20 10:13 ` Josh Wu
2012-08-21 1:21 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2012-08-16 5:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] at91: atmel_nand: remove unused variables Josh Wu
2012-08-21 1:22 ` Scott Wood
2012-08-16 5:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] at91: atmel_nand: Update driver to support Programmable Multibit ECC controller Josh Wu
2012-08-17 9:24 ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-08-21 10:37 ` Josh Wu
2012-08-21 20:39 ` Scott Wood
2012-08-22 3:26 ` Josh Wu
2012-08-21 1:37 ` Scott Wood
2012-08-16 5:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] at91: 9x5: change SMC config timing that both works for PMECC & non-PMECC Josh Wu
2012-08-21 10:46 ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-08-22 7:11 ` Josh Wu
2012-08-16 5:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] at91: 9x5: Enable PMECC for 5series ek board Josh Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5032E281.6000906@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox