[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] spiflash: at25: using common spi flash operation

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>]

Dear Bo Shen,

On 20.08.2012 08:32, Bo Shen wrote:
> Using common spi flash operation function to replace private operation
> funtion
> 
> This patch is based on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/177896/
> which has been merged by Mike frysinger

Mike, do you think this is a fix? Should it go into 2012.10? Will you
take it?

> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi/atmel.c |   11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/atmel.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/atmel.c
> index 89ebe9d..006f6d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/atmel.c
> @@ -518,13 +518,19 @@ struct spi_flash *spi_flash_probe_atmel(struct spi_slave *spi, u8 *idcode)
>  			asf->flash.erase = dataflash_erase_p2;
>  		}
>  
> +		asf->flash.page_size = page_size;
> +		asf->flash.sector_size = page_size;
>  		break;
>  
>  	case DF_FAMILY_AT26F:
>  	case DF_FAMILY_AT26DF:
>  		asf->flash.read = spi_flash_cmd_read_fast;
> -		asf->flash.write = dataflash_write_p2;
> -		asf->flash.erase = dataflash_erase_p2;
> +		asf->flash.write = spi_flash_cmd_write_multi;
> +		asf->flash.erase = spi_flash_cmd_erase;
> +		asf->flash.page_size = page_size;
> +		asf->flash.sector_size = 4096;

why do you take fixed value for sector size here?

> +		/* clear SPRL# bit for locked flash */
> +		spi_flash_cmd_write_status(&asf->flash, 0);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:
> @@ -532,7 +538,6 @@ struct spi_flash *spi_flash_probe_atmel(struct spi_slave *spi, u8 *idcode)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	asf->flash.sector_size = page_size;
>  	asf->flash.size = page_size * params->pages_per_block
>  				* params->blocks_per_sector
>  				* params->nr_sectors;

And here you correlate number of sectors with page size ... but we may
have page_size != sector_size for some at26 devices, aren't we?

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann