From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:51:10 +0800
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] spiflash: at25: using common spi flash
	operation
In-Reply-To: <201208211455.53924.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1345444344-31340-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com>
	<50337063.1040905@gmail.com> <201208211455.53924.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <50374E8E.40900@atmel.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Mike,

On 8/22/2012 2:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2012 07:26:27 Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>> On 20.08.2012 08:32, Bo Shen wrote:
>>> Using common spi flash operation function to replace private operation
>>> funtion
>>>
>>> This patch is based on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/177896/
>>> which has been merged by Mike frysinger
>>
>> Mike, do you think this is a fix? Should it go into 2012.10? Will you
>> take it?
>
> i'll take care of merging the changes to drivers/mtd/spi/*, but always happy
> to see people help to review the changes :).
>
> especially with the atmel driver as their dataflashes have the unique command
> set :(.

For atmel at25 and at26 series spi flash, they can support standard spi 
flash operation. So, this patch intent to use common spi flash operation.

Will this patch be took?

> -mike
>