[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Fix declaration type for I/O functions

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On 08/23/2012 01:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 01:03 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/23/2012 12:24 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
>>>> This patch (commit 20959471b5d07fdeb8603b918d80385aa2954711),
>>>> strangely, causes the error below to happen when I build
>>>> P1010RDB_36BIT_NAND:
>>>>
>>>> Configuring for P1010RDB_36BIT_NAND - Board: P1010RDB, Options: P1010RDB,36BIT,N
>>>> AND
>>>> make[1]: *** [/local/afleming/u-boot/nand_spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1
>>>> make: *** [nand_spl] Error 2
>>>> /opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.5.55-eglibc-2.11.55/powerpc-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc
>>>> -linux-gnu-size: './u-boot': No such file
>>>> /opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.5.55-eglibc-2.11.55/powerpc-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc
>>>> -linux-gnu-ld: section .bootpg loaded at [00000000ff801000,00000000ff80120f] ove
>>>> rlaps section .data loaded at [00000000ff800e90,00000000ff80102b]
>>>> make[1]: *** [/local/afleming/u-boot/nand_spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1
>>>> make: *** [nand_spl] Error 2
>>>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>>
>>>> ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc --version:
>>>> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Sourcery G++ Lite 2010.09-55) 4.5.1
>>>>
>>>> I'm guessing this change increased the amount of inlining. Sadly, the
>>>> subsequent patches, which were intended to shrink the SPL build, were
>>>> not enough to fix this problem.
>>>>
>>>> My inclination is to revert this patch until we figure out what went wrong.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha
>>>> <prabhakar@freescale.com> wrote:
>>>>> Prototype declaration of I/O operation functions are not correct. as both
>>>>> 'extern' and function definition are at same place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chage protoype declaration as static.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> It builds OK for me using that same toolchain.  What SHA1 are you building?
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>
>> Very top of Wolfgang's master branch.
>>
> 
> Sigh, I missed the "36bit" part.  Before reverting, let me see if I can
> fix it today.
> 
> BTW, "top of ..." is not a SHA1.

The p1010rdb patches I posted yesterday fix it for me.

-Scott