[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: Adds board_postclk_init to the init_sequence.

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>]

Hi Albert,

On 04.09.12 21:34, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:17:58 +0200, Andreas Bie?mann
> <andreas.devel@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Albert Aribaud,
>>
>> On 16.08.12 20:22, Markus Hubig wrote:
>>> The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations
>>> that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig <mhubig@imko.de>
>>> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/lib/board.c |    3 +++
>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> index f1951e8..109a1ac 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = {
>>>  	fdtdec_check_fdt,
>>>  #endif
>>>  	timer_init,		/* initialize timer */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_POSTCLK_INIT
>>> +	board_postclk_init,
>>> +#endif
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC
>>>  	get_clocks,
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>
>> how do you think about this suggestion? Will you accept it? Should I
>> apply both patches to u-boot-atmel?
> 
> From what I see, this converges with what's been in PPC for a long
> time... I'm ok with the series going into atmel.

So I add a formal Acked-by from you?

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann