From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 2/7] NAND: added NAND type to nand_ids
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:09:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504DD871.7040301@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504A434E.9020001@freescale.com>
On 07/09/2012 20:56, Scott Wood wrote:
Hi Scott,
>>>
>>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c | 2 ++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c
>>>>> index 3953549..fe75686 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c
>>>>> @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ const struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[] = {
>>>>> /* 128 Gigabit */
>>>>> {"NAND 16GiB 1,8V 8-bit", 0x1A, 0, 16384, 0, LP_OPTIONS},
>>>>> {"NAND 16GiB 3,3V 8-bit", 0x3A, 0, 16384, 0, LP_OPTIONS},
>>>>> + {"NAND 16GiB 3,3V 8-bit", 0x48, 4096, 16384, 0x100000,
>>>>> + LP_OPTIONS},
>>>>> {"NAND 16GiB 1,8V 16-bit", 0x2A, 0, 16384, 0, LP_OPTIONS16},
>>>>> {"NAND 16GiB 3,3V 16-bit", 0x4A, 0, 16384, 0, LP_OPTIONS16},
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why does this NAND chip need things specified that are zeroes for other
>>>> chips?
>>>
>>> At least on this board with MX35, the chip cannot be recognized.
>>> Manufacturer ID and device ID are read flawlessly, but then u-boot fails
>>> to get the correct geometry. Setting explicitely the values, I can then
>>> read / write into the NAND without any problem. It can be more a problem
>>> related to the specific MXC NAND driver (mxc_nand.c).
>>
>> It seems to me that the values returned by this flash cannot be
>> interpreted in nand_get_flash_type().
>>
>> The values returned from a READ-ID command with address 0x00 are:
>>
>> 0x2C 0x48 0x04 0x4A 0xA5,
>>
>> I can really get these values from the flash, so the MXC controller gets
>> the correct data.
>>
>> However, the code in nand_base.c (lines from 2718, so not-Samsung case)
>> parses the answer setting the NAND as a 16-bit device, but this is
>> really a 8bit device. I do not know the meaning of the answer, it is not
>> described in the datasheet.
>
> Does the datasheet say anything about what the ID data is supposed to
> look like and how to interpret it? I tried to download it and Micron
> shoved an NDA in my face.
I find no description in the datasheet.
>
> What kind of chip is this? Is the datasheet publicly available?
>
> These threads seem relevant:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/60042/
> http://old.nabble.com/-U-Boot--Add-new-NAND-flash-td29858370.html
It is the same case, as I can see, with the same chip.
>
> Does the chip support ONFI?
The chip supports ONFI, but it seems the i.MX driver does not. Quite as
described in http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/60042/. READ-ID is always
sent with address 0, I do not know if we can convince the driver to send
the address.
Regards,
Stefano
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 8:04 [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 0/7] In this patchset, a new i.MX35 board is added implementing Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 8:04 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 1/7] ARM: Fix start.S when used with SPL in arm1136 Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 8:04 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 2/7] NAND: added NAND type to nand_ids Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 23:19 ` Scott Wood
2012-09-07 9:12 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-07 15:23 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-07 18:56 ` Scott Wood
2012-09-10 12:09 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-09-10 23:18 ` Scott Wood
2012-10-01 7:02 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-23 19:01 ` Eric Bénard
2012-09-24 8:29 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 8:04 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 3/7] MX35: add LOW_LEVEL_SRAM_STACK to use SPL_FRAMEWORK Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 8:04 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 4/7] MX35: Add soc_boot_mode and soc_boot_device to MX35 Stefano Babic
2012-09-23 19:25 ` Eric Bénard
2012-09-24 8:35 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 8:04 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 5/7] SPL: Added MLO for mx35 SOC to SPL Makefile Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-06 19:59 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 20:48 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-06 21:57 ` stefano babic
2012-09-10 12:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-10 12:44 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-10 12:54 ` Tom Rini
2012-09-06 8:04 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 6/7] ARM: Add MLO target to arm1136 Stefano Babic
2012-09-06 8:05 ` [U-Boot] [NEXT PATCH v1 7/7] MX35: add support for woodburn board Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504DD871.7040301@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox