From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:35:40 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile In-Reply-To: <201209171829.30130.marex@denx.de> References: <1347643742-19966-1-git-send-email-jose.goncalves@inov.pt> <5056EC52.5040500@inov.pt> <20120917144556.GC31809@bill-the-cat> <201209171829.30130.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <5057515C.6080900@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/17/12 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > [...] > >>> If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the >>> new target to u-boot-pad.bin >> >> I think I'm OK with that. > > What about having CPU-overridable targets ? So omap can have it's own .ubl > result and commands leading to it ... and so can s3c24xx. Such targets would > have to be shifted into CPU-specific dirs, is that possible? The problem I see first is that "UBL" doesn't seem to mean anything in the context of s3c24xx, it just happens to be doing some of what the system wants. -- Tom