From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] I2C on iMX25
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:45:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50602BBD.5030605@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506028AE.9000008@arcor.de>
On 24/09/2012 11:32, Matthias Wei?er wrote:
> Hi Stefano
>
Hi Matthias,
> I am currently in the process of updating my zmx25 board support for a new
> hardware revision where I need I2C access. I2C on imx25 currently fails
> to build:
>
> mxc_i2c.c: In function 'i2c_imx_get_clk':
> mxc_i2c.c:101:31: error: 'MXC_IPG_PERCLK' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
Ok, I see.
>
> I can easily fix this by replacing MXC_IPG_PERCLK with MXC_I2C_CLK. But
> MXC_I2C_CLK is only defined for imx25. So, this change will break all other
> imx chips.
But this seems the right solution. The mxc_get_clk() gets as parameter
an enum representing a peripheral or a special clock name, valid for a
SOC. The driver should use the peripheral name.
> I can now add MXC_IPG_PERCLK to arch-mx25/clock.h and adopt
> generic.c accordingly but I don't think that this is the right way to go
> as the i2c clock can be different from perclk. Doing this
> #define MXC_IPG_PERCLK MXC_I2C_CLK
> in my config file is even more ugly.
This is wrong.
Really I think the right way is to add MXC_I2C_CLK to the other SOCs,
adding the case in their specific mxc_get_clock() implementation, for
example for mx6 something like this:
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c
index c67c3cf..8fa737a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c
@@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ unsigned int mxc_get_clock(enum mxc_clock clk)
case MXC_IPG_CLK:
return get_ipg_clk();
case MXC_IPG_PERCLK:
+ case MXC_I2C_CLK:
return get_ipg_per_clk();
case MXC_UART_CLK:
return get_uart_clk();
and updating the mxc_i2c driver to follow the same rule.
Best regards,
Stefano
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 9:32 [U-Boot] I2C on iMX25 Matthias Weißer
2012-09-24 9:45 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-09-24 11:04 ` Matthias Weißer
2012-09-24 11:05 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-24 11:34 ` Matthias Weißer
2012-09-24 12:35 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-24 11:54 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50602BBD.5030605@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox