From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:31:07 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] KernelDoc In-Reply-To: <20120926205721.0580820032E@gemini.denx.de> References: <201209252246.10322.marex@denx.de> <201209261726.55611.marex@denx.de> <20120926195412.AC7B32031A9@gemini.denx.de> <201209262158.48495.marex@denx.de> <20120926205721.0580820032E@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <5063741B.7050804@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/26/12 13:57, Wolfgang Denk wrote: [snip] >>> Can such checking (all functions have a kernel-doc comment, >>> which covers the return value and all arguments) be done >>> automatically, say throuch checkpatch? >> >> I would love to see this. > > Is anything like this available anywhere? Wire building the docs into patman, that'll cover big series which ought to be using it, at least. It's a thought.. - -- Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQY3QbAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WhpEP/RB0HQxOzFsTzl3ycvlj+NyA jxSndrPbevwW97ccvgrhfWYgEjG/dUoC+VtiBUvsYupLEL5y02NriblF0spnEfpO UA5wuucZX45EQ1rJvfVS1Rg2hiOeM4L3GxN8KqOCLE7X6rQV5PCS+4X2XvE3eGVx vUKoUdLCphlf0cpxKMLNXLZCrZhRwaDaJK9XghuWsYKkGtRiwDoo2qhl9AepJpaN INtI1aOlm40An5Ql32Y2dHXJMd+/W2dXqYzG/Jy1oqJI35UmPiSDP/Nr0O96Pe/G aO1Izo8aogEDkJRr6KVY5PiT9K3epFBBkO+LsQbOzB/KgUkH88yTk/dC0STXKEV0 LTwrp1aL8ISZ1DIWQ+EXBTM6mEvnCjOmj3+JrvetfcW5r9INqhWiytRtG/bshwJf /tKkM6X+5AujToNdZcfqxrb7o94KB3vQlU88f/HKZT39l0kxe61oXgxm1SPC64Wn Fpmd1NY2kQv9jm/xYa4Sa3dguk1uf89JAZfqfbvEzgOzkRCMTAPuAzSdJaVjzIBr B3HnjwWrfsI7XcMYme60nfI2NOx6aJDhMOvUrvOQFavFdeaL7RWUDIkStNYa7ZrW +mFg4JjcKNnPCCyV7W/xWT/MWnxzgOAwKcfx328XoCdCQqWx8QLZ7dCBmoF9aUhs T1K9yLYnshTKcWoe2oFk =F53o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----