From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Troy Kisky Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:58:53 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 30/32] mx6qsabrelite: change CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT In-Reply-To: <5072DB07.4010303@denx.de> References: <1348281558-19520-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <1349315254-21151-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <1349315254-21151-31-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <506E1BB3.4050005@boundarydevices.com> <5072DB07.4010303@denx.de> Message-ID: <50734C9D.3080303@boundarydevices.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 10/8/2012 6:54 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote: >> On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky >>> wrote: >>>> The prompt is not appropriate if not running on >>>> a mx6q processor. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky >>> But in this case the board name will change, no? >>> >> No, patch 29/32 sets the new boards to use the same config file >> (mx6qsabrelite.h) only adding ",MX6DL" or ",MX6S" or ",MX6Q" >> to the end of the line in boards.cfg > This means that CONFIG_MX6Dx is set. You can use it to set appropriately > the prompt or use a more generic name including the board name, as > "MX6SABRELITE U-Boot > ". The board is always the same, what is I can live with "MX6SABRELITE U-Boot" but I prefer a plain "U-Boot". The rest seems a waste of screen real estate. The long u-boot commands are more likely to wrap. Anyone else have an opinion??? Thanks Troy