From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Babic Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:58:01 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mxc: Fix SDHC multi-instance clock In-Reply-To: <1850571028.6438072.1349778906864.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> References: <1850571028.6438072.1349778906864.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> Message-ID: <50740339.5080806@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/10/2012 12:35, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:36:25 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: >> On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is >> not >> suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made >> directly with >> fsl_esdhc_initialize()). >> >> This patch fixes this issue by adding a configuration field for the >> SDHC input >> clock frequency. >> >> Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau >> Cc: Stefano Babic >> Cc: Eric B?nard >> Cc: Otavio Salvador >> Cc: Fabio Estevam >> Cc: Jason Liu >> Cc: Matt Sealey >> Cc: Andy Fleming >> --- >> This patch should be applied after (series of series...): >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187467/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187468/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187475/ >> >> This patch supersedes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187476/ . >> >> Changes for v2: >> - Since this patch will go to /next, extend the original patch with >> the mxc >> boards newly added to this branch: mx6qsabreauto and mx6qsabresd. > > Did you forget to apply this patch (and > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187468/ before it) when you applied my mx5 and > mx25 clock series, or is it just still in your TODO list? No, I did not forget. There are two patches for ESDHC. I wanted to be sure that PowerPC boards are not broken and I have rechecked it this morning. They are both ready in my queue to be merged. > If you could apply them before the Nitrogen6X series (in order to avoid a v3 of > this patch), I'd be grateful ;) . But if you need more review/test time, of > course no problem if this is not possible. I have some patches ready to be merged, but I sent also a pull request for the -next branch, and it is not yet merged into arm-next. Anyway, I can modify my pull request including further patches, too. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de =====================================================================