[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/4] FAT: make use of disk_partition_t.part

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 10/13/2012 01:38 PM, Pavel Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Wednesday 10 October 2012 12:14:00 Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> This removes the standalone cur_part_nr variable, opening the way to
>> replacing fat_register_device() with fat_set_blk_dev().
>>
>> Note that when get_partition_info() fails and we use the entire disk,
>> the correct partition number is 0 (whole disk) not 1 (first partition),
>> so that change is also made here.
>>
>> An alternative to this (and the previous) patch might be to simply
>> remove the partition number from the printf(). I don't know how attached
>> people are to it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> Just as a heads up, in the DM any difference between a partition and a whole 
> block device (also between different interfaces for disks) is hidden from any 
> user code (code other than the one keeping track of partitions/disks, that 
> only uses such information to determine whether to scan for partitions), you 
> only get some object that can read/write blocks if you ask it nicely, and you 
> have to make do with that (if you need more then you're probably doing 
> something wrong).
> As a result, there is no notion of partition number, and the string you are 
> patching up here (along with many others, due to unification of disk 
> interfaces) is changed.

OK, so do you think it'd be better right now to drop patches 1 and 2 in
this series, and just remove the partition number from fat.c's printf()
call? That'd certainly be simple to do.