From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vikram Narayanan Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:25:03 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/spl: Mark arguments as unused In-Reply-To: <508670ED.7010502@denx.de> References: <50866BEC.1030601@gmail.com> <508670ED.7010502@denx.de> Message-ID: <50867787.5050705@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 10/23/2012 3:56 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 10/23/2012 12:05 PM, Vikram Narayanan wrote: >> As dummy{1,2} are not used anywhere, mark it with __maybe_unused >> >> Signed-off-by: Vikram Narayanan >> Cc: Stefan Roese >> --- >> common/spl/spl.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c >> index 0d829c0..62fd3bd 100644 >> --- a/common/spl/spl.c >> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c >> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void spl_ram_load_image(void) >> } >> #endif >> >> -void board_init_r(gd_t *dummy1, ulong dummy2) >> +void board_init_r(__maybe_unused gd_t *dummy1, __maybe_unused ulong dummy2) >> { >> u32 boot_device; >> debug(">>spl:board_init_r()\n"); >> > > Perhaps even __always_unused instead of __maybe_unused as these > variables are never used? Yes. It is better, in the case if it is never used at all. Thanks, Vikram