From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:20:45 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git In-Reply-To: <00217854-DB7D-41FB-9A4E-77E929FA376D@freescale.com> References: <1350945375-14259-1-git-send-email-afleming@freescale.com>, <6AE080B68D46FC4BA2D2769E68D765B708108879@039-SN2MPN1-023.039d.mgd.msft.net> <00217854-DB7D-41FB-9A4E-77E929FA376D@freescale.com> Message-ID: <5086C3DD.1050407@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Fleming Andy-AFLEMING wrote: > Ah, I knew there was one more I needed to send a mail about. The 5040 > patch wouldn't apply anymore. Could you rebase? I was unable to > determine how to fix it. Rebase again? Ugh. > The CRC patch met with fierce opposition, so I > haven't applied it. The only opposition was from Wolfgang, and he was opposed to our EEPROM format as a whole, not to our patch. He doesn't like the idea that the only way to know the location of the CRC is to first read the ID field. Scott and I explained to him that we don't control this format, we just implement it. So I don't think there is any reasonable objection to my patch. Please apply it. Without it, we have a broken implementation of the EEPROM parser, and *that* is not acceptable. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale