From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vikram Narayanan Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:45:11 +0530 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/spl: Mark arguments as unused In-Reply-To: <20121023154549.GA6206@bill-the-cat> References: <50866BEC.1030601@gmail.com> <508670ED.7010502@denx.de> <20121023154549.GA6206@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <5086D09F.7040403@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 10/23/2012 9:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: >> On 10/23/2012 12:05 PM, Vikram Narayanan wrote: >>> As dummy{1,2} are not used anywhere, mark it with __maybe_unused >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vikram Narayanan >>> Cc: Stefan Roese >>> --- >>> common/spl/spl.c | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c >>> index 0d829c0..62fd3bd 100644 >>> --- a/common/spl/spl.c >>> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c >>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void spl_ram_load_image(void) >>> } >>> #endif >>> >>> -void board_init_r(gd_t *dummy1, ulong dummy2) >>> +void board_init_r(__maybe_unused gd_t *dummy1, __maybe_unused ulong dummy2) >>> { >>> u32 boot_device; >>> debug(">>spl:board_init_r()\n"); >>> >> >> Perhaps even __always_unused instead of __maybe_unused as these >> variables are never used? > > Also, what does this give us? Fixing a sparse warning? Not a sparse warning. I noticed this while looking at the code. ~Vikram