public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:15:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508E9D9D.4090801@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANr=Z=asUVhOT_ns6+NiNqb6YZ-QTr45D+pdX9W6XMB=QjVyPQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/26/2012 01:45 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:05:16PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2012 12:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:50:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>> On 10/24/2012 11:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been thinking about one of the problems we need to solve
>>>>>> over in TI AM335x land and that is given that we support a
>>>>>> number of different boards with a single binary (and we have an
>>>>>> i2c eeprom that tells us what board and revision we are on),
>>>>>> the user needs to be able to easily determine what board we are
>>>>>> on so they know what dtb file to load so they can boot.  To
>>>>>> this end I've added CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG to the
>>>>>> README which says when set we have board_name and board_rev set
>>>>>> at run-time.  Then for am335x[1]
>>>>>
>>>>> With CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG set, there's a environment
>>>>> variable named $board that indicates which board U-Boot is
>>>>> running on (and other related variables). The idea is that the
>>>>> user can:
>>>>>
>>>>> fsload ${devtype} ${devnum}:${rootpart} ${fdt_addr_r}  \
>>>>> /boot/${soc}-${board}.dtb
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG sets $board at compile-time,
>>>>> since the config variable was created in the context on a U-Boot
>>>>> that runs on a single board. However, I see no reason why we
>>>>> can't maintain the user-visible results of this config option
>>>>> even in other cases, so that everything is consistent to the
>>>>> user
>>>>
>>>> This works assuming that board maps to the device tree name.  A bit
>>>> more below...
>>>
>>> True. I've made sure of that for Tegra.
>>>
>>>>> To that end, can we make CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG set
>>>>> $board instead of $board_name?
>>>>
>>>> I had talked with Joe about this on IRC briefly and he seemed to
>>>> be against overwriting "board"
>>>
>>> Why is that? Perhaps alternatively, CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG
>>> should set both board and a default value for board_name.
>>
>> Joe?
> 
> It think in the use-case that you are talking about (multiple boards,
> one binary) the board from the build of the binary could still be
> useful to know in addition to the run-time-determined board name and
> rev.  I think it would also be useful to have the "target" available
> in the env for the same reason.  Tom and I also discussed this on IRC.

OK, so in that case I guess CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG should set both
board and board_name, so that both variables always exist for use by
scripts, so scripts don't have to contain endless conditionals. For the
multiple-boards-one-binary case, board_name can always be overridden at
run-time. If everyone agrees, I can send a patch to add that variable to
CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_CONFIG.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-29 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 17:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables Tom Rini
2012-10-24 17:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] README: Document CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG Tom Rini
2012-10-24 17:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] am335x_evm: Add CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONFIG support Tom Rini
2012-10-24 19:21   ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-24 20:56     ` Tom Rini
2012-10-24 17:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Standardize on run-time board ID variables Stephen Warren
2012-10-24 18:41   ` Tom Rini
2012-10-24 19:05     ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-24 19:32       ` Tom Rini
2012-10-24 22:24         ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-26  7:45         ` Joe Hershberger
2012-10-29 15:15           ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-10-29 18:13             ` Tom Rini
2012-10-30  0:14               ` Joe Hershberger
2012-10-26  2:41       ` Simon Glass
2012-11-04 18:29 ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508E9D9D.4090801@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox