From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Custodian branch base commits
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:20:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509052C2.2090203@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121030220607.6A9C3200204@gemini.denx.de>
On 10/30/2012 04:06 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
> In message <5090423C.5070605@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>
>>>>>> git checkout master
>>>>>> git reset --hard u-boot/master
> ...
>>> Why don't you do just
>>> git branch -D master
>>> git checkout -b master u-boot/master
>>> instead?
>>
>> That would work identically. The exact git commands to do this really
>> aren't the point of this conversation.
>
> Maybe not for you. But I was trying to understand what you are doing,
> and I find your approach difficult to read. A "git reset --hard" is
> nothign I ever do in the normal course of actions.
>
>>> BTW - why are you doing this on the "master" branch? Any other branch
>>> name appears more appropriate to me for such work?
>>
>> Well, the U-Boot wiki tells all custodians to use a branch named master,
>> and all the custodian repos I've needed to look at follow this convention.
>
> You are supposed to _never_ reset or rebase the master branch.
I assume that statement is conditionalized by "within the U-Boot
process" and "in the main u-boot.git repository"; it's not necessarily
required to be true just due to use of git.
Well, even in recent history, that hasn't been actual practice. The wiki
even explicitly tells you to rebase:
http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CustodianGitTrees
Who owns updating that? I could take a stab, but since I'm pretty new to
U-Boot development, not a custodian, and pushing for changes, I'm
probably not the best person to re-write it, and least not without a
code-review/patch-based process.
>>>> u-boot/master is the standard git nomenclature for remote u-boot
>>>> (assumed to point at git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git) branch master.
>>>
>>> standard git nomenclature? Do you happen to have a pointer for me?
>>
>> http://git-scm.com/book/ch3-5.html
>>
>> First sentence of the second paragraph in the body text.
>
> Ummm... this does not exactly mention that it is considered standard
> that "u-boot" refers to git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git . Please keep in
> mind that others might use different names - your original posting did
> not explain your assumptions.
Oh, I thought you were talking about the syntax, not the exact names of
remotes and branches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 17:35 [U-Boot] Custodian branch base commits Stephen Warren
2012-10-30 18:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-30 18:55 ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-30 20:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-30 21:10 ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-30 22:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-30 22:20 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-11-18 1:57 ` Jerry Van Baren
2012-10-30 21:19 ` Tom Rini
2012-10-31 16:56 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-03 11:49 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-11-05 17:17 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 19:39 ` Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509052C2.2090203@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox