From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ron Madrid <ron_madrid@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/8] New board SIMPC8313 support: nand
	support
In-Reply-To: <20080530213112.GA9752@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <509253.78935.qm@web83512.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

So am I just stuck until then, since we clearly shouldn't put old drivers into the code, but the
mtd branch is not rebased yet?  Or is there some other road I should be following?

Ron

--- Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> > So does this mean that I need to now base all of my patches off of the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch on
> the
> > u-boot-nand-flash tree?  How do the two (u-boot and u-boot-nand-flash) coincide, or don't
> they? 
> > It looks like in the Makefile of the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch the version of u-boot is 1.3.1.
> 
> I hope to get mtd-2.6.22.1 rebased onto current u-boot soon.
> 
> -Scott
>