From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] common: add ifdefs around bouncebuf.c body
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:07:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509951C8.3070503@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211060154.03822.marex@denx.de>
On 11/05/2012 05:54 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> If a U-Boot config file enables CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER only for the main
>> U-Boot build and not for the SPL, then config.mk will contain
>> CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER=y, so common/Makefile will build bouncebuf.c for
>> both the SPL and main U-Boot, but config.h won't set CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER
>> for the SPL, so bouncebuf.h will provide static inline functions, which
>> will conflict with the compiled bouncebuf.c. Solve this by guarding the
>> body of bouncebuf.c with the ifdef to avoid conflicts.
>
> Uh, don't you want the bounce buffer not compiled in for SPL? Then maybe add
> CONFIG_SPL_BOUNCE_BUFFER to force BB to be compiled into SPL or something ...
Not compiling bouncebuf.c for SPL would solve this too. I have no idea
what build system contortions would be required to do this though. Do
you think the build system should be fixed first rather than taking this
series/patch?
I guess we shouldn't need a separate CONFIG_SPL_BOUNCE_BUFFER option
though; we should rather simply set CONFIG_SPL_BOUNCE_BUFFER
appropriately for SPL and non-SPL, and have everything key off that one
variable, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-05 23:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] common: add ifdefs around bouncebuf.c body Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 23:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] common: rework bouncebuf implementation Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 23:54 ` Simon Glass
2012-11-06 18:44 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 19:30 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 23:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: tegra: use bounce buffer APIs Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 0:00 ` Simon Glass
2012-11-06 18:50 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 19:03 ` Simon Glass
2012-11-05 23:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] common: add ifdefs around bouncebuf.c body Simon Glass
2012-11-06 18:04 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 0:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 18:07 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-11-06 22:43 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 22:49 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 22:57 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 23:13 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-07 13:21 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-07 17:00 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-08 1:20 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509951C8.3070503@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox