public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: tegra: use bounce buffer APIs
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:50:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50995BEE.7020108@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ0LU_FTxyf4cEFeySadmukC3BeTw34qDr916+AUaTyV-A@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/05/2012 05:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Tegra's MMC driver does DMA, and hence needs cache-aligned buffers. In
>> some cases (e.g. user load commands) this cannot be guaranteed by callers
>> of the MMC APIs. To solve this, modify the Tegra MMC driver to use the
>> new bounce_buffer_*() APIs.

>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/tegra_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/tegra_mmc.c

>>  #include <asm/arch-tegra/clk_rst.h>
>>  #include <asm/arch-tegra/tegra_mmc.h>
>>  #include <mmc.h>
>> +#include <bouncebuf.h>
> 
> The order seems wrong here - I think bouncebuf and mmc should go above
> the asm/ ones, and bouncebuf should be first.

Is there a defined order for header files? I suppose I should try and
read and remember more documentation!

>> @@ -180,8 +196,10 @@ static int mmc_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd,
>>         if (data)
>>                 mmc_set_transfer_mode(host, data);
>>
>> -       if ((cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_136) && (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_BUSY))
>> -               return -1;
>> +       if ((cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_136) && (cmd->resp_type & MMC_RSP_BUSY)) {
>> +               ret = -1;
>> +               goto cleanup;
>> +       }
> 
> You might consider putting this body in a function so you don't need
> these two lines everywhere below.

I'm not quite sure how a function would work here; a function can't
really goto. Do you mean a macro? I'd tend to this a macro would
obfuscate the pretty simple code.

Oh, perhaps you mean having a new top-level function that does:

bounce_buffer_start();
calls a function to do all the work
bounce_buffer_stop();

That would certainly simplify the patch.

>> diff --git a/include/configs/tegra-common-post.h b/include/configs/tegra-common-post.h

>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_MMC
>> +#define CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER
>> +#endif
> 
> Is there really any harm in just defining this always (say in the
> tegra20-common.h)? The functions should be dropped if not used.

I suppose it'd be fine to always enable this since the linker should
drop the functions when not referenced. Of course, that relies on
bouncebuf.o not having any global side-effects (e.g. registering things
via custom linker segments that are always pulled in). The code above
represents the actual dependency too; hopefully one day U-Boot will
sprout Kconfig, and that logic can be replaced by:

config TEGRA_MMC
    select BOUNCE_BUFFER

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-06 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-05 23:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] common: add ifdefs around bouncebuf.c body Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 23:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] common: rework bouncebuf implementation Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 23:54   ` Simon Glass
2012-11-06 18:44     ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 19:30     ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-05 23:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: tegra: use bounce buffer APIs Stephen Warren
2012-11-06  0:00   ` Simon Glass
2012-11-06 18:50     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-11-06 19:03       ` Simon Glass
2012-11-05 23:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] common: add ifdefs around bouncebuf.c body Simon Glass
2012-11-06 18:04   ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06  0:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 18:07   ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 22:43     ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 22:49       ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 22:57         ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 23:13           ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-07 13:21             ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-07 17:00               ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-08  1:20                 ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50995BEE.7020108@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox