From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:28:18 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/46] Enhance spear support
In-Reply-To: <509A6BBB.6000801@denx.de>
References: <cover.1351876757.git.vipin.kumar@st.com>
	<509A6BBB.6000801@denx.de>
Message-ID: <509B3BEA.1020809@st.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 11/7/2012 7:40 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Vipin,
>
> On 11/02/2012 06:39 PM, Vipin Kumar wrote:
>> This patchset is split in several pieces
>> - Drivers: This is essentially a few new drivers and fixes in already exiasting
>>    drivers
>> - Enhancement: This series enhances the already existing spear support
>> - spear13xx: This is a totally new suppoort for spear13xx architecture
>
> Thanks for all these patches. This is a massive patch-set. I'll try to
> review at least some of them later this week. Please be patient.
>
> But this amount of patches does raise a question that I discussed a time
> ago. If you continue to work on upstream U-Boot, which we greatly
> appreciate, then its perhaps better to create/add an SPEAr U-Boot
> custodian responsible for the SPEAr related patches. Reviewing,
> collecting patches and pushing them to Alberts ARM repository. This
> would take a bit of work from Albert, since without such an custodian
> all those SPEAr patches would fall into his area.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> Albert, what are your thoughts on this?
>
> Vipin, would you "volunteer" to eventually become this SPEAr U-Boot
> custodian? Or someone else?
>

Yes, I volunteer to be the SPEAr U-Boot custodian..

Regards
Vipin

> Just my thought, comments welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk&  Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-51 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
>