From: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap: emif: configure emif only when required
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:02:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A39D71.40402@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352882943-14778-1-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com>
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 02:19 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> DMM_LISA_MAP registers program whether memory is mapped
> on particular EMIF or not. Irrespective of these registers
> EMIF is getting configured. Correcting the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/emif-common.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/emif-common.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/emif-common.c
> index 30dcf1b..179525f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/emif-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/emif-common.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> #include <asm/utils.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>
> +static int emif1_enabled = -1, emif2_enabled = -1;
> +
> void set_lpmode_selfrefresh(u32 base)
> {
> struct emif_reg_struct *emif = (struct emif_reg_struct *)base;
> @@ -1218,6 +1220,27 @@ void dmm_init(u32 base)
> }
> }
>
> +static void enable_emifs(void)
> +{
> + u32 i, section, valid;
> +
> + emif1_enabled = 0;
> + emif2_enabled = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + section = __raw_readl(DMM_BASE + i*4);
> + valid = (section & EMIF_SDRC_MAP_MASK) >>
> + (EMIF_SDRC_MAP_SHIFT);
> + if (valid == 1) {
> + emif1_enabled = 1;
> + } else if (valid == 2) {
> + emif2_enabled = 1;
> + } else if (valid == 3) {
> + emif1_enabled = 1;
> + emif2_enabled = 1;
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> /*
> * SDRAM initialization:
> * SDRAM initialization has two parts:
> @@ -1255,15 +1278,21 @@ void sdram_init(void)
> writel(CM_DLL_CTRL_NO_OVERRIDE, &prcm->cm_dll_ctrl);
> }
>
> - do_sdram_init(EMIF1_BASE);
> - do_sdram_init(EMIF2_BASE);
> -
> if (!in_sdram)
> dmm_init(DMM_BASE);
>
> + enable_emifs();
The function name is odd. It has got nothing to do with enabling
EMIF's. It just identifies which is enabled ?. How about
set_enabled_emifs ?
Also this can done just when you are configuring the LISA registers.
That way a extra function is avoided.
Regards,
Sricharan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-14 8:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap: emif: configure emif only when required Lokesh Vutla
2012-11-14 13:32 ` R Sricharan [this message]
2012-11-14 16:44 ` Lokesh Vutla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A39D71.40402@ti.com \
--to=r.sricharan@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox