[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[alex]

 Hi MAINTAINER:
  Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x80000.
if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If I set u-boot environment in the address 0xc0000 as EVK board, it's OK. I cant' know the reason.

Best Regards,
Alex

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Bo Shen]

Hi Alex,

On 11/19/2012 10:55, alex wrote:
>   Hi MAINTAINER:
>    Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND
> partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x80000.
> if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If
> I set u-boot environment in the address 0xc0000 as EVK board, it's OK. I
> cant' know the reason.

Which u-boot version do you use? Please also paste the u-boot boot log here.

Please also check the u-boot file size, will the env overlap with it?

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[alex]

more information. samba script as below:

## Falshing binaries
puts "-I- === Initialize the NAND access ==="
NANDFLASH::Init

puts "-I- === Enable PMECC OS Parameters ==="
NANDFLASH::NandHeaderValue HEADER 0xc0c00405

puts "-I- === Erase all the NAND flash blocs and test the erasing ==="
NANDFLASH::EraseAllNandFlash

puts "-I- === Load the bootstrap: nandflash_at91sam9-ek in the first sector ==="
NANDFLASH::SendBootFilePmeccCmd $bootstrapFile

puts "-I- === Load the u-boot image ==="
send_file {NandFlash} "$ubootFile" $ubootAddr 0

puts "-I- === Load the u-boot env image ==="
send_file {NandFlash} "$ubootenvFile" $ubootenvAddr 0

puts "-I- === Load the Kernel image ==="
send_file {NandFlash} "$kernelFile" $kernelAddr 0

puts "-I- === Enable trimffs ==="
NANDFLASH::NandSetTrimffs 1

puts "-I- === Load the linux file system ==="
send_file {NandFlash} "$rootfsFile" $rootfsAddr 0

puts "-I- === DONE. ==="





At 2012-11-19 13:37:15,alex <laub923@163.com> wrote:

I use u-boot v2010.06 with atmel's patch. I give u-boot 512K size.

U-Boot 2010.06-00002-gb006d3d-dirty (Nov 19 2012 - 09:53:38)

DRAM:  128 MiB
NAND:  No NAND device found!!!
NAND Flash not found !
No NAND device found!!!
0 MiB






At 2012-11-19 11:19:25,"Bo Shen" <voice.shen@atmel.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>On 11/19/2012 10:55, alex wrote:
>>   Hi MAINTAINER:
>>    Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND
>> partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x80000.
>> if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If
>> I set u-boot environment in the address 0xc0000 as EVK board, it's OK. I
>> cant' know the reason.
>
>Which u-boot version do you use? Please also paste the u-boot boot log here.
>
>Please also check the u-boot file size, will the env overlap with it?
>
>Best Regards,
>Bo Shen
>

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Bo Shen]

Hi Alex,

On 11/19/2012 13:40, alex wrote:
> more information. samba script as below:
>
> ## Falshing binaries
> puts "-I- === Initialize the NAND access ==="
> NANDFLASH::Init
>
> puts "-I- === Enable PMECC OS Parameters ==="
> NANDFLASH::NandHeaderValue HEADER 0xc0c00405
>
> puts "-I- === Erase all the NAND flash blocs and test the erasing ==="
> NANDFLASH::EraseAllNandFlash
>
> puts "-I- === Load the bootstrap: nandflash_at91sam9-ek in the first
> sector ==="
> NANDFLASH::SendBootFilePmeccCmd $bootstrapFile
>
> puts "-I- === Load the u-boot image ==="
> send_file {NandFlash} "$ubootFile" $ubootAddr 0
>
> puts "-I- === Load the u-boot env image ==="
> send_file {NandFlash} "$ubootenvFile" $ubootenvAddr 0
>
> puts "-I- === Load the Kernel image ==="
> send_file {NandFlash} "$kernelFile" $kernelAddr 0
>
> puts "-I- === Enable trimffs ==="
> NANDFLASH::NandSetTrimffs 1
>
> puts "-I- === Load the linux file system ==="
> send_file {NandFlash} "$rootfsFile" $rootfsAddr 0
>
> puts "-I- === DONE. ==="
>

This is no help. Without any useful information.

>
>
> At 2012-11-19 13:37:15,alex <laub923@163.com> wrote:
>
>     I use u-boot v2010.06 with atmel's patch. I give u-boot 512K size.
>
>     U-Boot 2010.06-00002-gb006d3d-dirty (Nov 19 2012 - 09:53:38)
>
>     DRAM:  128 MiB
>     NAND:  No NAND device found!!!
>     NAND Flash not found !
>     No NAND device found!!!
>     0 MiB

You should also provide bootstrap log info.

I think the code is get from www.at91.com/linux4sam.

Anyway, I assume that you use the source code and package get for the 
upper website. If so, the u-boot environment you change is overlap with 
u-boot. (If you write the u-boot at offset 0x40000, the size is larger 
than 256K, that means: u-boot offset + u-boot size > 0x80000). So, when 
save environment, it will overwrite the u-boot, which cause this issue.

Please check it again. If all thing as I guess, you can change the 
u-boot offset to 0x20000, or change environment offset to 0xa0000. you 
can choose which you prefer.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

>
>
>     At 2012-11-19 11:19:25,"Bo Shen" <voice.shen at atmel.com  <mailto:voice.shen@atmel.com>> wrote:
>     >Hi Alex,
>     >
>     >On 11/19/2012 10:55, alex wrote:
>     >>   Hi MAINTAINER:
>     >>    Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND
>     >> partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x80000.
>     >> if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If
>     >> I set u-boot environment in the address 0xc0000 as EVK board, it's OK. I
>     >> cant' know the reason.
>     >
>     >Which u-boot version do you use? Please also paste the u-boot boot log here.
>     >
>     >Please also check the u-boot file size, will the env overlap with it?
>     >
>     >Best Regards,
>     >Bo Shen
>     >
>
>
>
>
>

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[alex]

Hi:
  Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel' patch on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?



At 2012-11-19 14:10:27,"Bo Shen" <voice.shen@atmel.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>On 11/19/2012 13:40, alex wrote:
>> more information. samba script as below:
>>
>> ## Falshing binaries
>> puts "-I- === Initialize the NAND access ==="
>> NANDFLASH::Init
>>
>> puts "-I- === Enable PMECC OS Parameters ==="
>> NANDFLASH::NandHeaderValue HEADER 0xc0c00405
>>
>> puts "-I- === Erase all the NAND flash blocs and test the erasing ==="
>> NANDFLASH::EraseAllNandFlash
>>
>> puts "-I- === Load the bootstrap: nandflash_at91sam9-ek in the first
>> sector ==="
>> NANDFLASH::SendBootFilePmeccCmd $bootstrapFile
>>
>> puts "-I- === Load the u-boot image ==="
>> send_file {NandFlash} "$ubootFile" $ubootAddr 0
>>
>> puts "-I- === Load the u-boot env image ==="
>> send_file {NandFlash} "$ubootenvFile" $ubootenvAddr 0
>>
>> puts "-I- === Load the Kernel image ==="
>> send_file {NandFlash} "$kernelFile" $kernelAddr 0
>>
>> puts "-I- === Enable trimffs ==="
>> NANDFLASH::NandSetTrimffs 1
>>
>> puts "-I- === Load the linux file system ==="
>> send_file {NandFlash} "$rootfsFile" $rootfsAddr 0
>>
>> puts "-I- === DONE. ==="
>>
>
>This is no help. Without any useful information.
>
>>
>>
>> At 2012-11-19 13:37:15,alex <laub923@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>     I use u-boot v2010.06 with atmel's patch. I give u-boot 512K size.
>>
>>     U-Boot 2010.06-00002-gb006d3d-dirty (Nov 19 2012 - 09:53:38)
>>
>>     DRAM:  128 MiB
>>     NAND:  No NAND device found!!!
>>     NAND Flash not found !
>>     No NAND device found!!!
>>     0 MiB
>
>You should also provide bootstrap log info.
>
>I think the code is get from www.at91.com/linux4sam.
>
>Anyway, I assume that you use the source code and package get for the 
>upper website. If so, the u-boot environment you change is overlap with 
>u-boot. (If you write the u-boot at offset 0x40000, the size is larger 
>than 256K, that means: u-boot offset + u-boot size > 0x80000). So, when 
>save environment, it will overwrite the u-boot, which cause this issue.
>
>Please check it again. If all thing as I guess, you can change the 
>u-boot offset to 0x20000, or change environment offset to 0xa0000. you 
>can choose which you prefer.
>
>Best Regards,
>Bo Shen
>
>>
>>
>>     At 2012-11-19 11:19:25,"Bo Shen" <voice.shen at atmel.com  <mailto:voice.shen@atmel.com>> wrote:
>>     >Hi Alex,
>>     >
>>     >On 11/19/2012 10:55, alex wrote:
>>     >>   Hi MAINTAINER:
>>     >>    Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND
>>     >> partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x80000.
>>     >> if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If
>>     >> I set u-boot environment in the address 0xc0000 as EVK board, it's OK. I
>>     >> cant' know the reason.
>>     >
>>     >Which u-boot version do you use? Please also paste the u-boot boot log here.
>>     >
>>     >Please also check the u-boot file size, will the env overlap with it?
>>     >
>>     >Best Regards,
>>     >Bo Shen
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Andreas Bießmann]

Dear alex,

On 19.11.2012 11:23, alex wrote:
> Hi:
>   Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel' patch on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?

if you provide a rebased version on current HEAD we will do so.

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Bo Shen]

Hi Andreas,

On 11/19/2012 19:22, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Dear alex,
>
> On 19.11.2012 11:23, alex wrote:
>> Hi:
>>    Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel' patch on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?
>
> if you provide a rebased version on current HEAD we will do so.

What's your mean about this? What Alex ask has been merged into mainline.
His issue is that he change the offset of the u-boot environment cause 
the overlap with u-boot.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Andreas Bießmann]

Dear Bo Shen,

On 20.11.2012 03:01, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On 11/19/2012 19:22, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>> Dear alex,
>>
>> On 19.11.2012 11:23, alex wrote:
>>> Hi:
>>>    Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel'
>>> patch on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?
>>
>> if you provide a rebased version on current HEAD we will do so.
> 
> What's your mean about this? What Alex ask has been merged into mainline.
> His issue is that he change the offset of the u-boot environment cause
> the overlap with u-boot.

so is that change required globally? Why don't apply it to mainline then?

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Andreas Bießmann]

Dear Bo Shen,

On 26.11.2012 11:48, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Dear Bo Shen,
> 
> On 20.11.2012 03:01, Bo Shen wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On 11/19/2012 19:22, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>>> Dear alex,
>>>
>>> On 19.11.2012 11:23, alex wrote:
>>>> Hi:
>>>>    Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel'
>>>> patch on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?
>>>
>>> if you provide a rebased version on current HEAD we will do so.
>>
>> What's your mean about this? What Alex ask has been merged into mainline.
>> His issue is that he change the offset of the u-boot environment cause
>> the overlap with u-boot.
> 
> so is that change required globally? Why don't apply it to mainline then?

damn, it is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/198524/, correct? I should
have read the atmel related stuff more frequently these days. Sorry for
that, I was busy with nand related stuff on omap.

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Bo Shen]

Hi Andreas,

On 11/26/2012 19:01, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> Dear Bo Shen,
>
> On 26.11.2012 11:48, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>> Dear Bo Shen,
>>
>> On 20.11.2012 03:01, Bo Shen wrote:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> On 11/19/2012 19:22, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>>>> Dear alex,
>>>>
>>>> On 19.11.2012 11:23, alex wrote:
>>>>> Hi:
>>>>>     Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel'
>>>>> patch on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?
>>>>
>>>> if you provide a rebased version on current HEAD we will do so.
>>>
>>> What's your mean about this? What Alex ask has been merged into mainline.
>>> His issue is that he change the offset of the u-boot environment cause
>>> the overlap with u-boot.
>>
>> so is that change required globally? Why don't apply it to mainline then?
>
> damn, it is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/198524/, correct? I should
> have read the atmel related stuff more frequently these days. Sorry for
> that, I was busy with nand related stuff on omap.

For at91sam9x5ek board, the environment offset in mainline is OK.
This patch is for other Atmel boards which I found there are overlap 
between u-boot and u-boot env.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Bo Shen]

Hi Alex,

On 11/19/2012 18:23, alex wrote:
> Hi:
>    Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel' patch
> on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?

The mainline for at91sam9x5ek is supported. You can find it on tag 
2012.10 and after.

But, one thing should keep in mind, it only supports mainline Linux 
kernel for at91sam9x5ek.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[alex]

Can you tell me from which tag on mainline kernel can work with mainline u-boot?


At 2012-11-20 09:55:35,"Bo Shen" <voice.shen@atmel.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>On 11/19/2012 18:23, alex wrote:
>> Hi:
>>    Thanks, it can work now. BTW,  one question whether the atmel' patch
>> on v2010.6  is merged int u-boot mainline?
>
>The mainline for at91sam9x5ek is supported. You can find it on tag 
>2012.10 and after.
>
>But, one thing should keep in mind, it only supports mainline Linux 
>kernel for at91sam9x5ek.
>
>Best Regards,
>Bo Shen

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

[Bo Shen]

Hi Alex,

On 11/20/2012 11:11, alex wrote:
> Can you tell me from which tag on mainline kernel can work with mainline
> u-boot?

When the mainline kernel support at91sam9x5ek, it can work with mainline 
u-boot. You can choose the kernel version as you prefer.

Btw, this is u-boot ML. If you want to know much more about the Linux 
kernel for at91sam9x5ek. Please send e-mail to Linux kernel ML.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen