From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bo Shen Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:21:06 +0800 Subject: [U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash In-Reply-To: <50B34C13.9010609@gmail.com> References: <33d0ae3.3d99.13b1697bd61.Coremail.laub923@163.com> <50A9A53D.4060000@atmel.com> <31f4d5f2.6c66.13b172ba82e.Coremail.laub923@163.com> <75d85c55.6d24.13b172e466a.Coremail.laub923@163.com> <50A9CD53.7000501@atmel.com> <262e79ee.df4a.13b18320ba2.Coremail.laub923@163.com> <50AA166D.8050402@gmail.com> <50AAE483.8010008@atmel.com> <50B34915.2000400@gmail.com> <50B34C13.9010609@gmail.com> Message-ID: <50B41582.90108@atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Andreas, On 11/26/2012 19:01, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: > Dear Bo Shen, > > On 26.11.2012 11:48, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: >> Dear Bo Shen, >> >> On 20.11.2012 03:01, Bo Shen wrote: >>> Hi Andreas, >>> >>> On 11/19/2012 19:22, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: >>>> Dear alex, >>>> >>>> On 19.11.2012 11:23, alex wrote: >>>>> Hi: >>>>> Thanks, it can work now. BTW, one question whether the atmel' >>>>> patch on v2010.6 is merged int u-boot mainline? >>>> >>>> if you provide a rebased version on current HEAD we will do so. >>> >>> What's your mean about this? What Alex ask has been merged into mainline. >>> His issue is that he change the offset of the u-boot environment cause >>> the overlap with u-boot. >> >> so is that change required globally? Why don't apply it to mainline then? > > damn, it is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/198524/, correct? I should > have read the atmel related stuff more frequently these days. Sorry for > that, I was busy with nand related stuff on omap. For at91sam9x5ek board, the environment offset in mainline is OK. This patch is for other Atmel boards which I found there are overlap between u-boot and u-boot env. Best Regards, Bo Shen