From: trem <tremyfr@yahoo.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] apf27: add support for the armadeus APF27 board
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:07:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BB8AE4.5070304@yahoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121126185500.0bb988d0@lilith>
On 26/11/12 18:55, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Fuse bank 1 row 8 is "reserved for future use" and therefore available for
>> + * custormer use. The APF27 board uses this fuse to store the board revision:
>> + * 0: initial board revision
>> + * 1: first revision - Presence of the second RAM chip on the board is blown in
>> + * fuse bank 1 row 9 bit 0 - No hardware change
>> + * N: to be defined
>
> (aside: I am somewhat surprised that something "reserved for future
> use" can be considered "available for customer use": reserved areas
> are... reserved... thus probably not available -- future revisions of
> the *IC* may actually exercize the reservation, causing a conflict
> with the *board* assumptions. But hey, that's not a U-boot issue)
This is a reference to the freescale documentation.
It means that customer (here Armadeus) can use it to store
informations.
...
>> +int
>> +misc_init_r(void)
>> +{
>> + char *s;
>> + u_char * firmware_buffer = (u_char *)(CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR + \
>> + CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN);
>> + size_t size = 0;
>> + size_t offset = -1;
>> + char *autoload = getenv("firmware_autoload");
>
> Is this used?
Yes, this function can be used if it's enable in the u-boot environment.
...
>> +{
>> + /* Enable D-cache. I-cache is already enabled in start.S */
>> + dcache_enable();
>> +}
>> +
>> +inline void lowlevel_init(void) {}
>
> What's the point of defining lowlevel_init? If you don't do low level
> inits, then you can define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT in the board
> config header file.
In fact lowlevel_init isn't only the call of a function, this is also
some "low level" init (like cache). I need this low level init, but
I don't need to call a function, so I only define an empty function.
...
regards,
Philippe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-02 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 17:35 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] apf27: add support of armadeus apf27 v2 Philippe Reynes
2012-10-29 17:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] apf27: add missing constant to mx27 Philippe Reynes
2012-10-29 17:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] apf27: add support for the armadeus APF27 board Philippe Reynes
2012-11-26 17:55 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-12-02 17:07 ` trem [this message]
2012-10-29 17:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] apf27: add spl support for the apf27 Philippe Reynes
2012-10-30 20:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-11-26 18:02 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-12-02 17:09 ` trem
2012-10-29 17:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] apf27: add FPGA support for the apf27 board Philippe Reynes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BB8AE4.5070304@yahoo.fr \
--to=tremyfr@yahoo.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox