public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH resend] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:28:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C04206.9040904@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C03F96.4010209@compulab.co.il>

On 12/6/2012 12:17 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 12/06/12 08:30, Vipin Kumar wrote:
>> Few pen drives take longer than usual for enumeration. The u-boot unlike linux
>> does not depend on interrupts and works in polling and timeout mode.
>>
>> This patch increases this timeout to increase the set of usb sticks that can be
>> enumerated by u-boot
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar<vipin.kumar@st.com>
>> ---
>>   common/usb_hub.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/usb_hub.c b/common/usb_hub.c
>> index e4a1201..24de9b7 100644
>> --- a/common/usb_hub.c
>> +++ b/common/usb_hub.c
>> @@ -393,17 +393,34 @@ static int usb_hub_configure(struct usb_device *dev)
>>   		"" : "no ");
>>   	usb_hub_power_on(hub);
>>
>> +	mdelay(1500);
>
> a 1.5 seconds? This looks like a huge overkill...
> Even for broken usb sticks...
>

Yes, but we are not talking about performance in u-boot. And since we 
are working in a polling mode, we only have 1 chance to detect the pen-drive

>> +
>>   	for (i = 0; i<  dev->maxchild; i++) {
>>   		ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER(struct usb_port_status, portsts, 1);
>>   		unsigned short portstatus, portchange;
>> +		int ret;
>> +		ulong start = get_timer(0);
>> +
>> +		do {
>> +			ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
>> +			if (ret<  0) {
>> +				USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>> +			portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
>> +
>> +			if ((portchange&  USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION)&&
>> +				(portstatus&  USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
>> +				break;
>>
>> -		if (usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts)<  0) {
>> -			USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
>> +			mdelay(100);
>> +		} while (get_timer(start)<  CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10);
>> +
>> +		if (ret<  0)
>>   			continue;
>> -		}
>>
>> -		portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>> -		portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
>>   		USB_HUB_PRINTF("Port %d Status %X Change %X\n",
>>   				i + 1, portstatus, portchange);
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-06  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-06  6:30 [U-Boot] [PATCH resend] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06  6:47 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-06  6:58   ` Vipin Kumar [this message]
2012-12-06  7:36     ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-06  9:03       ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06 11:44         ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-06 17:36 ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C04206.9040904@st.com \
    --to=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox