public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH resend 2/2] arm/boards: Define a new config option CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:44:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C068F4.3000107@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee5f783dffac1a94acdd7bb7f8f20cc6c4af7019.1354786138.git.vipin.kumar@st.com>

On 12/06/2012 10:29 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:
> A lot of ARM boards are using board_init routine just to initialize boot_params
> variable in the global data structure.
> 
> This patch lets the board config files to define a CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P option
> which is assigned to gd->bd->bi_boot_params automatically
> 
> Consequently, many board_init routines would not be required in the respective
> board directories and a weak definition becomes necessary before their removal
> from the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
> ---
>  README               |  6 ++++++
>  arch/arm/lib/board.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 037513a..2077c3b 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -550,6 +550,12 @@ The following options need to be configured:
>  		in a single configuration file and the machine type is
>  		runtime discoverable, do not have to use this setting.
>  
> +		CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P		[relevant for ARM only]
> +
> +		This config option can provide a way to initialize
> +		bi_boot_params from the u-boot infrastructure itself. The
> +		board still has the option to override it in board_init routine
> +
>  - vxWorks boot parameters:
>  
>  		bootvx constructs a valid bootline using the following
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> index 92cad9a..fa161b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> @@ -399,6 +399,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong bootflag)
>  	gd->bd->bi_arch_number = CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; /* board id for Linux */
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P
> +	/* Boot params passed to Linux */
> +	gd->bd->bi_boot_params = CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P;
> +#endif

Again an ugly #ifdef. Why not something like this instead:

Define a default earlier in the code (is 0x100 the best default?):

#ifndef CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P
#define CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P	0x100
#endif

then here just:

	/* Boot params passed to Linux */
	gd->bd->bi_boot_params = CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P;

without the #ifdef.

> +
>  	addr_sp -= sizeof (gd_t);
>  	id = (gd_t *) addr_sp;
>  	debug("Reserving %zu Bytes for Global Data at: %08lx\n",
> @@ -468,6 +473,13 @@ void board_init_f(ulong bootflag)
>  static char *failed = "*** failed ***\n";
>  #endif
>  
> +static int __def_board_init(bd_t *bis)
> +{
> +	return -1;

Is -1 a good value to return as default board_init()?

> +}
> +
> +int board_init(void) __attribute__((weak, alias("__def_board_init")));
> +

Use __weak from inlcude/linux/compiler.h instead:

int __weak board_init(bd_t *bis)
...


Thanks,
Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-06  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-06  9:29 [U-Boot] [PATCH resend 1/2] u-boot/spl: Add u-boot-spl.img to u-boot targets Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06  9:29 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH resend 2/2] arm/boards: Define a new config option CONFIG_BOOT_PARAMS_P Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06  9:44   ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2012-12-06  9:56     ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06 11:26       ` Stefan Roese
2012-12-07  9:40         ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 14:47           ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-12-17  8:15             ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06 12:08 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH resend 1/2] u-boot/spl: Add u-boot-spl.img to u-boot targets Stefan Roese
2012-12-07  9:47   ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 10:44     ` Stefan Roese
2012-12-07 11:55       ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 11:59         ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C068F4.3000107@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox