[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Minkyu Kang]

This patch fix following errors

universal.c: In function 'init_pmic_lcd':
universal.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_pmic'
universal.c:340: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
universal.c: In function 'lcd_power_on':
universal.c:431: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
universal.c: At top level:
universal.c:335: warning: 'init_pmic_lcd' defined but not used

Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Cc: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
---
 board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c b/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
index 3d508be..4869798 100644
--- a/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
+++ b/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static int get_hwrev(void)
 	return board_rev & 0xFF;
 }
 
+static void init_pmic_lcd(void);
+
 int power_init_board(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -63,6 +65,8 @@ int power_init_board(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	init_pmic_lcd();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
 	unsigned char val;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
+	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
 
 	if (pmic_probe(p))
 		return;
@@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static void reset_lcd(void)
 
 static void lcd_power_on(void)
 {
-	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
+	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
 
 	if (pmic_probe(p))
 		return;
-- 
1.7.9.5

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Minkyu Kang,

In message <50C58623.3090308@samsung.com> you wrote:
...
> @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
>  	unsigned char val;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>  
>  	if (pmic_probe(p))
>  		return;
> @@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static void reset_lcd(void)
>  
>  static void lcd_power_on(void)
>  {
> -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>  
>  	if (pmic_probe(p))
>  		return;

This is unrelated to your patch - but what if pmic_get() returns NULL?

pmic_probe() will crashif you pass it a NULL pointer...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Digital computers are themselves more complex than most things people
build: They have very large numbers of states. This makes conceiving,
describing, and testing them hard. Software systems  have  orders-of-
magnitude more states than computers do.           - Fred Brooks, Jr.

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Wolfgang,

> Dear Minkyu Kang,
> 
> In message <50C58623.3090308@samsung.com> you wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
> >  	unsigned char val;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  
> > -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> > +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
> >  
> >  	if (pmic_probe(p))
> >  		return;
> > @@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static void reset_lcd(void)
> >  
> >  static void lcd_power_on(void)
> >  {
> > -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> > +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
> >  
> >  	if (pmic_probe(p))
> >  		return;
> 
> This is unrelated to your patch - but what if pmic_get() returns NULL?
> 
> pmic_probe() will crashif you pass it a NULL pointer...

The PMIC 2.0 uses malloc to allocate pmic structure.

The fix, which has been proposed would work for old pmic.

In the new one PMIC 2.0, we require to test return pointer from
pmic_get() (similar to all malloc allocations):

struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
if (!p)
	return -ENODEV;


> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux Platform Group

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Minkyu Kang]

Dear Wolfgang,

On 10/12/12 18:32, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
>> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>>
>> In message <50C58623.3090308@samsung.com> you wrote:
>> ...
>>> @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
>>>  	unsigned char val;
>>>  	int ret = 0;
>>>  
>>> -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
>>> +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>>>  
>>>  	if (pmic_probe(p))
>>>  		return;
>>> @@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static void reset_lcd(void)
>>>  
>>>  static void lcd_power_on(void)
>>>  {
>>> -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
>>> +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>>>  
>>>  	if (pmic_probe(p))
>>>  		return;
>>
>> This is unrelated to your patch - but what if pmic_get() returns NULL?
>>
>> pmic_probe() will crashif you pass it a NULL pointer...
> 
> The PMIC 2.0 uses malloc to allocate pmic structure.
> 
> The fix, which has been proposed would work for old pmic.
> 
> In the new one PMIC 2.0, we require to test return pointer from
> pmic_get() (similar to all malloc allocations):
> 
> struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
> if (!p)
> 	return -ENODEV;
> 

I will fix it by another patch.

Thanks.
Minkyu Kang.

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Lukasz Majewski,

In message <20121210103224.372c572e@amdc308.digital.local> you wrote:
> 
> > This is unrelated to your patch - but what if pmic_get() returns NULL?
> > 
> > pmic_probe() will crashif you pass it a NULL pointer...
> 
> The PMIC 2.0 uses malloc to allocate pmic structure.

...and malloc() can fail.

> The fix, which has been proposed would work for old pmic.
> 
> In the new one PMIC 2.0, we require to test return pointer from
> pmic_get() (similar to all malloc allocations):
> 
> struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
> if (!p)
> 	return -ENODEV;

So this code here needs fixing.  This is what I wanted to point out.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"If you want to eat hippopatomus, you've got to pay the  freight."  -
attributed to an IBM guy, about why IBM software uses so much memory

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Piotr Wilczek]

On 12/10/2012 07:50 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> This patch fix following errors
>
> universal.c: In function 'init_pmic_lcd':
> universal.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_pmic'
> universal.c:340: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
> universal.c: In function 'lcd_power_on':
> universal.c:431: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
> universal.c: At top level:
> universal.c:335: warning: 'init_pmic_lcd' defined but not used
>
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
> Cc: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> ---
>   board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c |    8 ++++++--
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c b/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
> index 3d508be..4869798 100644
> --- a/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
> +++ b/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static int get_hwrev(void)
>   	return board_rev & 0xFF;
>   }
>
> +static void init_pmic_lcd(void);
> +
>   int power_init_board(void)
>   {
>   	int ret;
> @@ -63,6 +65,8 @@ int power_init_board(void)
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> +	init_pmic_lcd();
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
>   	unsigned char val;
>   	int ret = 0;
>
> -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>
>   	if (pmic_probe(p))
>   		return;
> @@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ static void reset_lcd(void)
>
>   static void lcd_power_on(void)
>   {
> -	struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> +	struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>
>   	if (pmic_probe(p))
>   		return;
>
Tested-by: Piotr Wilczek <p.wilczek@samsung.com>

[U-Boot] universal_c210: fix compiler error and compiler warning

[Minkyu Kang]

On 10/12/12 15:50, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> This patch fix following errors
> 
> universal.c: In function 'init_pmic_lcd':
> universal.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_pmic'
> universal.c:340: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
> universal.c: In function 'lcd_power_on':
> universal.c:431: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
> universal.c: At top level:
> universal.c:335: warning: 'init_pmic_lcd' defined but not used
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
> Cc: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> ---
>  board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

applied to u-boot-samsung/resolve

Thanks.
Minkyu Kang.