public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH resend] spi/arm-pl022: Add support for ARM PL022 spi controller
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:02:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C85D3C.3050104@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C859F5.6020907@denx.de>

On 12/12/2012 3:48 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 12/06/2012 07:56 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:
>> From: Armando Visconti<armando.visconti@st.com>
>>
>> This patch adds the support for the ARM PL022 SPI controller for the standard
>> variant (0x00041022), which has a 16bit wide and 8 locations deep TX/RX FIFO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti<armando.visconti@st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar<vipin.kumar@st.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Dear Wolfgang, Stefan,
>>
>> There seems to be no direct owner of spi framework. So, I am directing this
>> patch to you
>
> A few comments below.
>
>> Regards
>> Vipin
>>
>>   drivers/spi/Makefile    |   1 +
>>   drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c | 308 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 309 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/Makefile b/drivers/spi/Makefile
>> index 824d357..3a4e4b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_MXC_SPI) += mxc_spi.o
>>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_MXS_SPI) += mxs_spi.o
>>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_OC_TINY_SPI) += oc_tiny_spi.o
>>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_OMAP3_SPI) += omap3_spi.o
>> +COBJS-$(CONFIG_PL022_SPI) += pl022_spi.o
>>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOFT_SPI) += soft_spi.o
>>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_SH_SPI) += sh_spi.o
>>   COBJS-$(CONFIG_FSL_ESPI) += fsl_espi.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3ea769a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
>> +/*
>> + * (C) Copyright 2012
>> + * Armando Visconti, ST Microelectronics, armando.visconti at st.com.
>> + *
>> + * Driver for ARM PL022 SPI Controller. Based on atmel_spi.c
>> + * by Atmel Corporation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
>> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
>> + * MA 02111-1307 USA
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include<common.h>
>> +#include<malloc.h>
>> +#include<spi.h>
>> +#include<asm/io.h>
>> +#include<asm/arch/hardware.h>
>> +
>> +/* SSP registers mapping */
>> +#define SSP_CR0		0x000
>> +#define SSP_CR1		0x004
>> +#define SSP_DR		0x008
>> +#define SSP_SR		0x00C
>> +#define SSP_CPSR	0x010
>> +#define SSP_IMSC	0x014
>> +#define SSP_RIS		0x018
>> +#define SSP_MIS		0x01C
>> +#define SSP_ICR		0x020
>> +#define SSP_DMACR	0x024
>> +#define SSP_ITCR	0x080
>> +#define SSP_ITIP	0x084
>> +#define SSP_ITOP	0x088
>> +#define SSP_TDR		0x08C
>
> Please use C-structs instead to access the registers.
>

May be this patch is a ripped version from linux. That's why
Thanks. I will do this in v2

>> +#define SSP_PID0	0xFE0
>> +#define SSP_PID1	0xFE4
>> +#define SSP_PID2	0xFE8
>> +#define SSP_PID3	0xFEC
>> +
>> +#define SSP_CID0	0xFF0
>> +#define SSP_CID1	0xFF4
>> +#define SSP_CID2	0xFF8
>> +#define SSP_CID3	0xFFC
>> +
>> +/* SSP Control Register 0  - SSP_CR0 */
>> +#define SSP_CR0_SPO		(0x1<<  6)
>> +#define SSP_CR0_SPH		(0x1<<  7)
>> +#define SSP_CR0_8BIT_MODE	(0x07)
>> +#define SSP_SCR_MAX		(0xFF)
>> +#define SSP_SCR_SHFT		8
>> +
>> +/* SSP Control Register 0  - SSP_CR1 */
>> +#define SSP_CR1_MASK_SSE	(0x1<<  1)
>> +
>> +#define SSP_CPSR_MAX		(0xFE)
>> +
>> +/* SSP Status Register - SSP_SR */
>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_TFE		(0x1<<  0) /* Transmit FIFO empty */
>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_TNF		(0x1<<  1) /* Transmit FIFO not full */
>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_RNE		(0x1<<  2) /* Receive FIFO not empty */
>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_RFF		(0x1<<  3) /* Receive FIFO full */
>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_BSY		(0x1<<  4) /* Busy Flag */
>> +
>> +struct pl022_spi_slave {
>> +	struct spi_slave slave;
>> +	void *regs;
>> +	unsigned int freq;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct pl022_spi_slave *to_pl022_spi(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +{
>> +	return container_of(slave, struct pl022_spi_slave, slave);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Following three functions should be provided by the
>> + * board support package.
>> + */
>> +int spi_cs_is_valid(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs)
>> +	__attribute__((weak, alias("__spi_cs_is_valid")));
>> +void spi_cs_activate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +	__attribute__((weak, alias("__spi_cs_activate")));
>> +void spi_cs_deactivate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +	__attribute__((weak, alias("__spi_cs_deactivate")));
>
> __weak from linux/compiler.h
>

OK

>> +int __spi_cs_is_valid(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs)
>> +{
>> +	return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __spi_cs_activate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +{
>> +	/* do nothing */
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __spi_cs_deactivate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +{
>> +	/* do nothing */
>> +}
>> +
>> +void spi_init()
>> +{
>> +	/* do nothing */
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * ARM PL022 exists in different 'flavors'.
>> + * This drivers currently support the standard variant (0x00041022), that has a
>> + * 16bit wide and 8 locations deep TX/RX FIFO.
>> + */
>> +static int pl022_is_supported(struct pl022_spi_slave *ps)
>> +{
>> +	/* PL022 version is 0x00041022 */
>> +	if ((readw(ps->regs + SSP_PID0) == 0x22)&&
>> +		(readw(ps->regs + SSP_PID1) == 0x10)&&
>> +		((readw(ps->regs + SSP_PID2)&  0xf) == 0x04)&&
>> +		(readw(ps->regs + SSP_PID3) == 0x00))
>> +			return 1;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs,
>> +			unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode)
>> +{
>> +	struct pl022_spi_slave	*ps;
>> +	u16 scr = 1, prescaler, cr0 = 0, cpsr = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (!spi_cs_is_valid(bus, cs))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	ps = malloc(sizeof(*ps));
>> +	if (!ps)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	ps->slave.bus = bus;
>> +	ps->slave.cs = cs;
>> +	ps->freq = max_hz;
>> +
>> +	switch (bus) {
>> +	case 0:
>> +		ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE;
>> +		break;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE1
>> +	case 1:
>> +		ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE1;
>> +		break;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE2
>> +	case 2:
>> +		ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE2;
>> +		break;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE3
>> +	case 3:
>> +		ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE3;
>> +		break;
>> +#endif
>> +	default:
>> +		free(ps);
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Check the PL022 version */
>> +	if (!pl022_is_supported(ps)) {
>> +		free(ps);
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Set requested polarity and 8bit mode */
>> +	cr0 = SSP_CR0_8BIT_MODE;
>> +	cr0 |= (mode&  SPI_CPHA) ? SSP_CR0_SPH : 0;
>> +	cr0 |= (mode&  SPI_CPOL) ? SSP_CR0_SPO : 0;
>> +
>> +	writew(cr0, ps->regs + SSP_CR0);
>> +
>> +	/* Program the SSPClk frequency */
>> +	prescaler = CONFIG_SYS_SPI_CLK / ps->freq;
>> +
>> +	if (prescaler<= 0xFF)
>> +		cpsr = prescaler;
>> +	else {
>> +		for (scr = 1; scr<= SSP_SCR_MAX; scr++) {
>> +			if (!(prescaler % scr)) {
>> +				cpsr = prescaler / scr;
>> +				if (cpsr<= SSP_CPSR_MAX)
>> +					break;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (scr>  SSP_SCR_MAX) {
>> +			scr = SSP_SCR_MAX;
>> +			cpsr = prescaler / scr;
>> +			cpsr&= SSP_CPSR_MAX;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (cpsr&  0x1)
>> +		cpsr++;
>> +
>> +	writew(cpsr, ps->regs + SSP_CPSR);
>> +	cr0 = readw(ps->regs + SSP_CR0);
>> +	writew(cr0 | (scr - 1)<<  SSP_SCR_SHFT, ps->regs + SSP_CR0);
>> +
>> +	return&ps->slave;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void spi_free_slave(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +{
>> +	struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>> +
>> +	free(ps);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +{
>> +	struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>> +
>> +	/* Enable the SPI hardware */
>> +	writew(readw(ps->regs + SSP_CR1) | SSP_CR1_MASK_SSE,
>> +			ps->regs + SSP_CR1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
>> +{
>> +	struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>> +
>> +	/* Disable the SPI hardware */
>> +	writew(0x0, ps->regs + SSP_CR1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen,
>> +		const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> +	struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>> +	u32		len_tx = 0, len_rx = 0, len;
>> +	u32		ret = 0;
>> +	const u8	*txp = dout;
>> +	u8		*rxp = din, value;
>> +
>> +	if (bitlen == 0)
>> +		/* Finish any previously submitted transfers */
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * TODO: The controller can do non-multiple-of-8 bit
>> +	 * transfers, but this driver currently doesn't support it.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * It's also not clear how such transfers are supposed to be
>> +	 * represented as a stream of bytes...this is a limitation of
>> +	 * the current SPI interface.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (bitlen % 8) {
>> +		ret = -1;
>> +
>> +		/* Errors always terminate an ongoing transfer */
>> +		flags |= SPI_XFER_END;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	len = bitlen / 8;
>> +
>> +	if (flags&  SPI_XFER_BEGIN)
>> +		spi_cs_activate(slave);
>> +
>> +	while (len_tx<  len) {
>> +		if (readw(ps->regs + SSP_SR)&  SSP_SR_MASK_TNF) {
>> +			value = (txp != NULL) ? *txp++ : 0;
>> +			writew(value, ps->regs + SSP_DR);
>> +			len_tx++;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (readw(ps->regs + SSP_SR)&  SSP_SR_MASK_RNE) {
>> +			value = readw(ps->regs + SSP_DR);
>> +			if (rxp)
>> +				*rxp++ = value;
>> +			len_rx++;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	while (len_rx<  len_tx) {
>> +		if (readw(ps->regs + SSP_SR)&  SSP_SR_MASK_RNE) {
>> +			value = readw(ps->regs + SSP_DR);
>> +			if (rxp)
>> +				*rxp++ = value;
>> +			len_rx++;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	if (flags&  SPI_XFER_END)
>> +		spi_cs_deactivate(slave);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>
> Looks good.
>

Thanks..will send v2 very soon

> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
> .
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-06  6:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH resend] spi/arm-pl022: Add support for ARM PL022 spi controller Vipin Kumar
2012-12-06  8:05 ` Stefan Roese
2012-12-12 10:00   ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 10:18 ` Stefan Roese
2012-12-12 10:32   ` Vipin Kumar [this message]
2012-12-12 11:10     ` Armando Visconti
2012-12-12 11:15       ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:29       ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C85D3C.3050104@st.com \
    --to=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox