public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:40:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C86D40.4010906@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C8543F.8000508@st.com>

On 12/12/12 11:54, Vipin Kumar wrote:
> 
>>> +        ulong start = get_timer(0);
>>> +
>>> +        do {
>>> +            ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
>>> +            if (ret<  0) {
>>> +                USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
>>> +                break;
>>> +            }
>>> +
>>> +            portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>>> +            portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
>>> +
>>> +            if ((portchange&  USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ==
>>> +                (portstatus&  USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
>>
>> I don't know if there is any corner case when the above check
>> will always fail and so it will always wait a maximal delay time.
>> Are those registers that identical, or can there be differences?
>>
>>> +                break;
>>> +
>>> +            mdelay(100);
>>> +        } while (get_timer(start)<  CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10);
>>
>> Is there any justification for the CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10?
>> I would be much more fine with this patch if there were any
>> (even just test based * 2) reason for that number.
>>
> 
> Not really. Just a practical test.

Ok. good. can we please have a comment saying that this value
is based on observations? Thanks!
You can add my ack along with the comment in v3.

Thanks for the patch!

-- 
Regards,
Igor.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  8:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 10:03 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:18   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:32     ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12  9:54   ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:25     ` Marek Vasut
2012-12-13  6:11       ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:40     ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2012-12-12 12:00       ` Vipin Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C86D40.4010906@compulab.co.il \
    --to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox